<p>"There is no dispute over 67 acre land acquired by the Centre in Ayodhya therefore it should be given for the construction of a grand temple of Ram," Kalyan, who was the Chief Minister when Babar Masjid was demolished in 1992, told reporters here.<br />"I have written a letter to the Prime Minister today in this regard," he said.<br />The former BJP leader said that the High Court has given its verdict on 1,500 square feet land, which was in question.<br /><br />"If this 1,500 square feet land is divided in three parts, then only 500 square feet would be available for the construction of the temple which is insufficient," he said.<br />Kalyan claimed that the court in its verdict had admitted that so called mosque was constructed after demolishing a "Grand Temple" and decided that Ramlala Virajman was the owner of the Janmbhoomi.<br /><br />"However in the second part of the verdict the disputed land has been divided in three parts which means that only one-third land would be available for Ramlala," he said.<br />He said that the land was very less to construct a grand and historical temple for Ram.<br />"On this much land a temple as imagine can never be constructed," he said.<br />Kalyan said that division of 67 acre land would not be justified as it would become a bone of contention which will not be in the interest of either Muslims or Hindus.<br /><br />"Construction of temple would develop Ayodhya as a international tourist centre and generate revenue to the tune of several crore rupees," he said.<br />The former BJP leader said that he would meet MPs and ask them to mount pressure on the Centre for the transfer of 67 acre land.<br />He said that implementing the High Court verdict was the responsibility of the Centre as well as the state government.<br /><br />"Chief Minister Mayawati has held Centre responsible, but in reality it is the responsibility of the state as well," he said.<br />He said tight security arrangements should be made to protect Ram Janmbhoomi as anti-social elements and communal forces can go to any extent to damage it.<br />"In the past terrorist had made an attempt to destroy the temple there therefore the Centre and the state should not confused by the silence after the Ayodhya verdict," Kalyan said.<br /><br />The JKP founder said that giving land for Ram temple would wash all the sins of the Congress.<br />"As far as the BJP is concerned it should stay away from the temple movement," he said.</p>
<p>"There is no dispute over 67 acre land acquired by the Centre in Ayodhya therefore it should be given for the construction of a grand temple of Ram," Kalyan, who was the Chief Minister when Babar Masjid was demolished in 1992, told reporters here.<br />"I have written a letter to the Prime Minister today in this regard," he said.<br />The former BJP leader said that the High Court has given its verdict on 1,500 square feet land, which was in question.<br /><br />"If this 1,500 square feet land is divided in three parts, then only 500 square feet would be available for the construction of the temple which is insufficient," he said.<br />Kalyan claimed that the court in its verdict had admitted that so called mosque was constructed after demolishing a "Grand Temple" and decided that Ramlala Virajman was the owner of the Janmbhoomi.<br /><br />"However in the second part of the verdict the disputed land has been divided in three parts which means that only one-third land would be available for Ramlala," he said.<br />He said that the land was very less to construct a grand and historical temple for Ram.<br />"On this much land a temple as imagine can never be constructed," he said.<br />Kalyan said that division of 67 acre land would not be justified as it would become a bone of contention which will not be in the interest of either Muslims or Hindus.<br /><br />"Construction of temple would develop Ayodhya as a international tourist centre and generate revenue to the tune of several crore rupees," he said.<br />The former BJP leader said that he would meet MPs and ask them to mount pressure on the Centre for the transfer of 67 acre land.<br />He said that implementing the High Court verdict was the responsibility of the Centre as well as the state government.<br /><br />"Chief Minister Mayawati has held Centre responsible, but in reality it is the responsibility of the state as well," he said.<br />He said tight security arrangements should be made to protect Ram Janmbhoomi as anti-social elements and communal forces can go to any extent to damage it.<br />"In the past terrorist had made an attempt to destroy the temple there therefore the Centre and the state should not confused by the silence after the Ayodhya verdict," Kalyan said.<br /><br />The JKP founder said that giving land for Ram temple would wash all the sins of the Congress.<br />"As far as the BJP is concerned it should stay away from the temple movement," he said.</p>