<p>The BCCI on Saturday refuted allegations that it violated India’s foreign exchange regulations during the 2009 IPL in South Africa, insisting that all the payments were “bona fide and legitimate.” <br /><br /></p>.<p>Reacting to a media report which stated that the BCCI had been issued a notice by the Enforcement Directorate for contravening FEMA by remitting Rs 283 crore to Cricket South Africa (CSA) and paying IMG Rs 88.48 crore for services in the conduct of the IPL, the Board stated the “violation of Rs 1600 crores mentioned in the report is misleading.” <br /><br />“The BCCI wishes to clarify that these show cause notices were issued in July 2011 and October 2011 and that the BCCI has given detailed replies refuting the charges,” BCCI secretary Sanjay Patel said in a statement. <br /><br />“The BCCI also wishes to clarify that the reported violation of Rs 1600 crores mentioned in the report is misleading. The total foreign exchange payments made to CSA and IMG covered by these notices were only Rs 283 crores but adding up charges of contraventions of multiple provisions of FEMA has resulted in this figure,” he added. <br /><br />“The BCCI reiterates that these payments were bona fide and legitimate.”<br /><br />The financial transactions during that edition of the IPL had kicked up a storm in South Africa as well and led to the stepping down of CSA CEO Gerald Majola for sanctioning millions in bonuses for himself and some other CSA officials.<br /><br />Justifying the payments made to IMG, Patel said the company had been hired to provide “expert assistance” in conducting the IPL as per the international standards.<br /><br />“IPL II was shifted to South Africa in 2009, since the Government of India was unable to make the necessary security arrangements since its forces were deployed for election duty,” he recalled. <br /><br />“Rather than cancel IPL II, which would have led to loss of prestige for India as a cricketing nation and led to loss of foreign exchange income by way of telecast rights, the BCCI shifted the tournament to South Africa,” Patel explained.</p>
<p>The BCCI on Saturday refuted allegations that it violated India’s foreign exchange regulations during the 2009 IPL in South Africa, insisting that all the payments were “bona fide and legitimate.” <br /><br /></p>.<p>Reacting to a media report which stated that the BCCI had been issued a notice by the Enforcement Directorate for contravening FEMA by remitting Rs 283 crore to Cricket South Africa (CSA) and paying IMG Rs 88.48 crore for services in the conduct of the IPL, the Board stated the “violation of Rs 1600 crores mentioned in the report is misleading.” <br /><br />“The BCCI wishes to clarify that these show cause notices were issued in July 2011 and October 2011 and that the BCCI has given detailed replies refuting the charges,” BCCI secretary Sanjay Patel said in a statement. <br /><br />“The BCCI also wishes to clarify that the reported violation of Rs 1600 crores mentioned in the report is misleading. The total foreign exchange payments made to CSA and IMG covered by these notices were only Rs 283 crores but adding up charges of contraventions of multiple provisions of FEMA has resulted in this figure,” he added. <br /><br />“The BCCI reiterates that these payments were bona fide and legitimate.”<br /><br />The financial transactions during that edition of the IPL had kicked up a storm in South Africa as well and led to the stepping down of CSA CEO Gerald Majola for sanctioning millions in bonuses for himself and some other CSA officials.<br /><br />Justifying the payments made to IMG, Patel said the company had been hired to provide “expert assistance” in conducting the IPL as per the international standards.<br /><br />“IPL II was shifted to South Africa in 2009, since the Government of India was unable to make the necessary security arrangements since its forces were deployed for election duty,” he recalled. <br /><br />“Rather than cancel IPL II, which would have led to loss of prestige for India as a cricketing nation and led to loss of foreign exchange income by way of telecast rights, the BCCI shifted the tournament to South Africa,” Patel explained.</p>