<p>Accepting Kazmi's apology, Judge M L Tahaliyani also withdrew his observation that Kazmi was a liar.<br /><br />The judge had yesterday called him a liar as Kazmi denied that special public prosecutor Ujjwal Nikam had stated in his opening address on May 8 that he would file affidavits of witnesses.<br /><br />Kazmi today said, "This is a historic trial and I have done my best to defend the accused. What happened yesterday was in the heat of the moment and I tender an unconditional apology."<br /><br />The judge said that he was also withdrawing his remarks about Kazmi, as he wanted the issue to be resolved amicably.<br /><br />Kazmi offered apology after advocate Nikam intervened and sought time from the court to resolve the issue.<br /><br />The judge then adjourned proceedings for 40 minutes following which Kazmi decided to apologise. <br /><br />In today's order, the judge said, "In the interests of justice the issue has been resolved amicably. Keeping in mind the submissions made by proseuctor and the defence lawyer, it can be said that the observations made by me yesterday would not be taken into consideration."<br /><br />Earlier, when the court assembled in the morning, Kazmi said that he was shocked over the court's observation that he was a liar. "Please tell me the allegations against me and I shall reply within 24 hours after taking independent legal advice," he said.<br /><br />Kazmi's controversial statement came on Thursday after prosecutor Nikam informed the Judge that he desired to file 340 affidavits of formal witnesses and that copies of 233 such documents have already been served on the defence lawyer.<br /><br />When the judge asked Kazmi whether he wanted to cross examine any of these witnesses, Kazmi said that he would declare his strategy after Nikam filed these affidavits in the court.<br /><br />Nikam said he had informed the court in his opening address on May 8 that he would be filing such affidavits.<br /><br />However, Kazmi said Nikam had not made such disclosure in his opening address, prompting the judge to say that he (Kazmi) was telling lies. <br /><br />"This is a serious matter and you are telling lies. I now have to consider whether to continue you as a defence lawyer. You have been appointed by the court to defend the accused and it is your duty to co-operate in the interest of justice," judge Tahaliyani had observed.<br /><br />Today, after the issue had been resolved, copies of 340 affidavits were officially handed over to Kazmi and two other accused, Fahim Ansari and Sabauddin Ahmed.</p>
<p>Accepting Kazmi's apology, Judge M L Tahaliyani also withdrew his observation that Kazmi was a liar.<br /><br />The judge had yesterday called him a liar as Kazmi denied that special public prosecutor Ujjwal Nikam had stated in his opening address on May 8 that he would file affidavits of witnesses.<br /><br />Kazmi today said, "This is a historic trial and I have done my best to defend the accused. What happened yesterday was in the heat of the moment and I tender an unconditional apology."<br /><br />The judge said that he was also withdrawing his remarks about Kazmi, as he wanted the issue to be resolved amicably.<br /><br />Kazmi offered apology after advocate Nikam intervened and sought time from the court to resolve the issue.<br /><br />The judge then adjourned proceedings for 40 minutes following which Kazmi decided to apologise. <br /><br />In today's order, the judge said, "In the interests of justice the issue has been resolved amicably. Keeping in mind the submissions made by proseuctor and the defence lawyer, it can be said that the observations made by me yesterday would not be taken into consideration."<br /><br />Earlier, when the court assembled in the morning, Kazmi said that he was shocked over the court's observation that he was a liar. "Please tell me the allegations against me and I shall reply within 24 hours after taking independent legal advice," he said.<br /><br />Kazmi's controversial statement came on Thursday after prosecutor Nikam informed the Judge that he desired to file 340 affidavits of formal witnesses and that copies of 233 such documents have already been served on the defence lawyer.<br /><br />When the judge asked Kazmi whether he wanted to cross examine any of these witnesses, Kazmi said that he would declare his strategy after Nikam filed these affidavits in the court.<br /><br />Nikam said he had informed the court in his opening address on May 8 that he would be filing such affidavits.<br /><br />However, Kazmi said Nikam had not made such disclosure in his opening address, prompting the judge to say that he (Kazmi) was telling lies. <br /><br />"This is a serious matter and you are telling lies. I now have to consider whether to continue you as a defence lawyer. You have been appointed by the court to defend the accused and it is your duty to co-operate in the interest of justice," judge Tahaliyani had observed.<br /><br />Today, after the issue had been resolved, copies of 340 affidavits were officially handed over to Kazmi and two other accused, Fahim Ansari and Sabauddin Ahmed.</p>
