<p>PwC Australia's sale of its government consulting business may give it temporary respite from a crisis in its tax practice but is unlikely to repair its toxic brand in the country anytime soon, according to experts.</p>.<p>PwC said on Sunday it would sell the division for A$1 ($0.67) to private equity firm Allegro Funds to repair trust and save jobs.</p>.<p>But a source with direct knowledge of the matter said partners from the division drove the divorce to rescue their livelihoods from a damaged brand frozen out of government contracts. The person could not be named as they were not authorised to speak publicly.</p>.<p>PwC's brand has been damaged by revelations that a former partner shared with colleagues confidential government plans to prevent tax avoidance which were then used to pitch multinational companies for work.</p>.<p>The exodus of public sector partners could lead others to follow, according to Allan Fels, a former head of Australia's competition watchdog, as the scandal is investigated by three parliamentary inquiries, including one launched on Friday, and probes by police and two tax authorities.</p>.<p>"The sale does not resolve the issues of past behaviour including possible criminal action," he told Reuters. "They'll (staff will) be thinking: 'The firm's reputation has been damaged and will affect my part of the business.'"</p>.<p>PwC declined to comment.</p>.<p>Fels has long called for the "big four" firms to split audit from advisory to avoid the latter compromising the former.</p>.<p>The spin-off illustrates how the enormous pressure and scrutiny on PwC from regulators and politicians is creating friction with the partners and staff who are the firm's main assets.</p>.<p>PwC acting chief executive Kristin Stubbins told a state parliament inquiry on Monday the firm would not benefit from a sale that will lop off a fifth of its current revenues.</p>.<p>Six months since tax authorities first revealed the PwC breach, questions remain about the staff and clients involved, and a string of government agencies, public bodies and pension funds have frozen ties with the firm.</p>.<p>While Allegro Funds will rebrand its purchase and appoint a mostly independent board, PwC remains saddled with the tax practice at the heart of the scandal.</p>.<p>That taint is likely to spread despite the "purification ritual" sale to Allegro Funds, said Professor Clinton Free, who teaches management accounting, fraud and governance at the University of Sydney.</p>.<p>"That would see a further loss in revenue and profit elsewhere due to the brand impact as clients walk away," he said.</p>.<p>Already the two senators leading the federal government inquiry have warned the firm the sale will not wipe away responsibility.</p>.<p>"It is beyond plausible that PwC think they can just phoenix their way out of the deep cultural failures that are a matter of record and remain unresolved," Labor Senator Deborah O'Neill said.</p>.<p><em>($1 = 1.4894 Australian dollars)</em></p>
<p>PwC Australia's sale of its government consulting business may give it temporary respite from a crisis in its tax practice but is unlikely to repair its toxic brand in the country anytime soon, according to experts.</p>.<p>PwC said on Sunday it would sell the division for A$1 ($0.67) to private equity firm Allegro Funds to repair trust and save jobs.</p>.<p>But a source with direct knowledge of the matter said partners from the division drove the divorce to rescue their livelihoods from a damaged brand frozen out of government contracts. The person could not be named as they were not authorised to speak publicly.</p>.<p>PwC's brand has been damaged by revelations that a former partner shared with colleagues confidential government plans to prevent tax avoidance which were then used to pitch multinational companies for work.</p>.<p>The exodus of public sector partners could lead others to follow, according to Allan Fels, a former head of Australia's competition watchdog, as the scandal is investigated by three parliamentary inquiries, including one launched on Friday, and probes by police and two tax authorities.</p>.<p>"The sale does not resolve the issues of past behaviour including possible criminal action," he told Reuters. "They'll (staff will) be thinking: 'The firm's reputation has been damaged and will affect my part of the business.'"</p>.<p>PwC declined to comment.</p>.<p>Fels has long called for the "big four" firms to split audit from advisory to avoid the latter compromising the former.</p>.<p>The spin-off illustrates how the enormous pressure and scrutiny on PwC from regulators and politicians is creating friction with the partners and staff who are the firm's main assets.</p>.<p>PwC acting chief executive Kristin Stubbins told a state parliament inquiry on Monday the firm would not benefit from a sale that will lop off a fifth of its current revenues.</p>.<p>Six months since tax authorities first revealed the PwC breach, questions remain about the staff and clients involved, and a string of government agencies, public bodies and pension funds have frozen ties with the firm.</p>.<p>While Allegro Funds will rebrand its purchase and appoint a mostly independent board, PwC remains saddled with the tax practice at the heart of the scandal.</p>.<p>That taint is likely to spread despite the "purification ritual" sale to Allegro Funds, said Professor Clinton Free, who teaches management accounting, fraud and governance at the University of Sydney.</p>.<p>"That would see a further loss in revenue and profit elsewhere due to the brand impact as clients walk away," he said.</p>.<p>Already the two senators leading the federal government inquiry have warned the firm the sale will not wipe away responsibility.</p>.<p>"It is beyond plausible that PwC think they can just phoenix their way out of the deep cultural failures that are a matter of record and remain unresolved," Labor Senator Deborah O'Neill said.</p>.<p><em>($1 = 1.4894 Australian dollars)</em></p>