<p>The Delhi High Court on Wednesday declined to entertain a plea seeking action against "certain persons" for carrying out an alleged illegal animal slaughter on Bakri Eid.</p>.<p>The plea had contended that the slaughter activities result in pollution of the Yamuna river as all the waste is dumped into it.</p>.<p>A bench of Chief Justice D N Patel and Justice Prateek Jalan said the issue of pollution of the Yamuna was already being examined by the National Green Tribunal.</p>.<p>The bench also said that general orders as sought by the petitioner, a law student, cannot be issued. It added that she ought to have pointed out the "certain persons" who are violating the law.</p>.<p>The bench gave liberty to the petitioner to make a representation to authorities regarding her grievance.</p>.<p>The court said that as and when the petitioner makes a representation, it should be decided by concerned authorities "in accordance with law, rules, regulations and government policy applicable to such cases and as expeditiously as possible and practicable".</p>.<p>The court disposed of the petition as not pressed.</p>.<p>The petitioner decided not to press the plea and sought to make a representation after the bench said it will dismiss the petition with costs.</p>.<p>In her plea, the law student has claimed that she made a representation to authorities last year also prior to the Bakri Eid celebrations, but no action was taken till date and that is why she moved the instant petition.</p>
<p>The Delhi High Court on Wednesday declined to entertain a plea seeking action against "certain persons" for carrying out an alleged illegal animal slaughter on Bakri Eid.</p>.<p>The plea had contended that the slaughter activities result in pollution of the Yamuna river as all the waste is dumped into it.</p>.<p>A bench of Chief Justice D N Patel and Justice Prateek Jalan said the issue of pollution of the Yamuna was already being examined by the National Green Tribunal.</p>.<p>The bench also said that general orders as sought by the petitioner, a law student, cannot be issued. It added that she ought to have pointed out the "certain persons" who are violating the law.</p>.<p>The bench gave liberty to the petitioner to make a representation to authorities regarding her grievance.</p>.<p>The court said that as and when the petitioner makes a representation, it should be decided by concerned authorities "in accordance with law, rules, regulations and government policy applicable to such cases and as expeditiously as possible and practicable".</p>.<p>The court disposed of the petition as not pressed.</p>.<p>The petitioner decided not to press the plea and sought to make a representation after the bench said it will dismiss the petition with costs.</p>.<p>In her plea, the law student has claimed that she made a representation to authorities last year also prior to the Bakri Eid celebrations, but no action was taken till date and that is why she moved the instant petition.</p>