<p>Arguing before the Supreme Court, senior advocate Kapil Sibal on Thursday quoted a Deccan Herald news <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/state/mangaluru/hijab-ban-16-muslim-girls-from-mangalore-university-colleges-drop-out-1137668.html" target="_blank">report</a> based on the response received by reporter Harsha under the RTI, showing a 16% dropout of students in Pre University Colleges due to the hijab ban.</p>.<p>"145 students out of 900 have collected their transfer certificates..It is very very disturbing," he submitted before a bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia.</p>.<p>Representing Samastha Kerala Sunni Yuvajana Sangam (SYS), Sibal also said the matter should be referred to the Constitution Bench.</p>.<p><strong>Read | <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/national/shouldnt-have-heard-the-case-must-refer-to-larger-bench-advocate-dave-to-sc-on-hijab-row-1145316.html" target="_blank">'Shouldn't have heard the case, must refer to larger bench': Advocate Dave to SC on hijab row</a></strong></p>.<p>"The constitutional issue in this batch of petitions raises questions which have not been decided before by this court and relates to whether freedom of expression, a fundamental right under Article 19(1)(a), includes the right of a citizen to express herself by giving expression to her culture with reference to how she covers her body," he said. </p>.<p>Sibal said hijab can be worn at public places in our country, it is expression of who you are, what you are and where you belong to.</p>.<p>"Will my fundamental rights get extinguished when I enter school? I have been wearing Hijab, it is part of my persona, part of my cultural tradition, does this stop at the college gate," he asked.</p>.<p>"Am I not entitled to say I belong to diverse culture, autonomy of mind and body," he further asked.</p>.<p>"The kind of dress worn by a citizen also gives expression to the autonomy of the mind by which she also protects the autonomy of her body. There can be no quarrel with the proposition that a citizen is entitled to give expression of her personality by not just wearing a dress of her choice but, in the context of her cultural traditions, wearing such dress which allows others to identify that she belongs to a particular community, embraces a particular culture, and represents the values of that culture," he said.</p>.<p>Sibal said since the birth of our Republic, in Karnataka, this practice of wearing a hijab has been followed by girl students and there has been no untoward incident till date that can give rise to a situation where the state, which is obligated to protect the composite culture of India, has chosen to intervene through a “government order”, contrary to the provisions of the Constitution, and allows for the infringement of fundamental rights without any compelling need and without any rational basis. <br /> </p>
<p>Arguing before the Supreme Court, senior advocate Kapil Sibal on Thursday quoted a Deccan Herald news <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/state/mangaluru/hijab-ban-16-muslim-girls-from-mangalore-university-colleges-drop-out-1137668.html" target="_blank">report</a> based on the response received by reporter Harsha under the RTI, showing a 16% dropout of students in Pre University Colleges due to the hijab ban.</p>.<p>"145 students out of 900 have collected their transfer certificates..It is very very disturbing," he submitted before a bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia.</p>.<p>Representing Samastha Kerala Sunni Yuvajana Sangam (SYS), Sibal also said the matter should be referred to the Constitution Bench.</p>.<p><strong>Read | <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/national/shouldnt-have-heard-the-case-must-refer-to-larger-bench-advocate-dave-to-sc-on-hijab-row-1145316.html" target="_blank">'Shouldn't have heard the case, must refer to larger bench': Advocate Dave to SC on hijab row</a></strong></p>.<p>"The constitutional issue in this batch of petitions raises questions which have not been decided before by this court and relates to whether freedom of expression, a fundamental right under Article 19(1)(a), includes the right of a citizen to express herself by giving expression to her culture with reference to how she covers her body," he said. </p>.<p>Sibal said hijab can be worn at public places in our country, it is expression of who you are, what you are and where you belong to.</p>.<p>"Will my fundamental rights get extinguished when I enter school? I have been wearing Hijab, it is part of my persona, part of my cultural tradition, does this stop at the college gate," he asked.</p>.<p>"Am I not entitled to say I belong to diverse culture, autonomy of mind and body," he further asked.</p>.<p>"The kind of dress worn by a citizen also gives expression to the autonomy of the mind by which she also protects the autonomy of her body. There can be no quarrel with the proposition that a citizen is entitled to give expression of her personality by not just wearing a dress of her choice but, in the context of her cultural traditions, wearing such dress which allows others to identify that she belongs to a particular community, embraces a particular culture, and represents the values of that culture," he said.</p>.<p>Sibal said since the birth of our Republic, in Karnataka, this practice of wearing a hijab has been followed by girl students and there has been no untoward incident till date that can give rise to a situation where the state, which is obligated to protect the composite culture of India, has chosen to intervene through a “government order”, contrary to the provisions of the Constitution, and allows for the infringement of fundamental rights without any compelling need and without any rational basis. <br /> </p>