Major firms not doing enough to curb deforestation: Report

Many major global firms and financial institutions that directly or indirectly contribute to deforestation do not have any policies in place to protect forests, increasing the risk for catastrophic nature loss, a report said Wednesday.

The report comes just months after countries reached a historic agreement to protect 30 per cent of the world's land and seas by 2030 at UN biodiversity talks late last year.

At the same time, incoming legislation for the European Union and the United Kingdom will tighten rules around trading commodities associated with deforestation.

Also Read | Brazil launches first anti-deforestation raids under Lula bid to protect Amazon

But new analysis Wednesday showed that hundreds of firms still have not set a single policy on deforestation despite these high-level commitments.

These companies are at risk -- financially, reputationally, operationally -- if they do not take steps to reduce their role in deforestation, the Forest 500 analysis by non-profit research group Global Canopy said.

"While there have been pockets of progress, the majority of companies and financial institutions are living on borrowed time, putting climate and nature goals at risk," Global Canopy director Niki Mardas said.

The report found that 201 of the 500 companies and financial institutions with the most influence on tropical deforestation -- 40 per cent of all firms assessed -- failed to set any deforestation policies, barely unchanged from a year ago.

They included VW Group and Deichmann Group, Europe's largest footwear retailer. Deichmann said in a statement to AFP it does not directly source any materials from countries "associated with the issue of deforestation", while VW Group did not reply to a request for comment.

The report assessed 350 companies with the greatest stake in forest-risk commodities: palm oil, soy, beef, leather, timber and pulp and paper. It also looked at the 150 financial institutions providing the most finance to these companies.

It found that 100 companies have deforestation commitments in place for all of the commodities to which they are exposed, including Britain's consumer goods firm Unilever and Sainsbury's supermarket.

But is said only half of these are actively monitoring their suppliers or sourcing regions in line with their own policies.

"More companies have commitments, but few are taking sufficient action to deliver on them," Global Canopy said.

Deforestation -- driven by commodity crops such as palm oil and soy, cattle pasture and timber exploitation -- threatens climate, communities and the diversity of life on Earth.

Experts say containing deforestation is key to reaching climate goals.

Last year, some 330 firms wrote an open letter to world leaders appealing for rules and regulations to force them to reveal their impact on nature.

New laws in the EU and UK should help to propel that effort, but Global Canopy said companies need to do better -- and can with more data tools and guidance available than ever before.

"Really, 2023 is the best year there has ever been to act on deforestation," Emma Thomson, Forest 500 lead, told AFP.

"If companies and financial institutions act on deforestation, it is a really concentrated way to have a huge impact on both the climate crisis and the nature crisis," she added.

The analysis also revealed that just a fraction of financial institutions "most exposed to deforestation are addressing deforestation as a systemic risk".

Of the 150 financial institutions assessed, 92 do not have a deforestation policy covering their lending and investments.

The financial institutions, which included major asset managers BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street, provide $6.1 trillion in finance to companies in forest-risk supply chains, it said.

The report also found that the average company's score for respecting human rights linked to deforestation fell by seven percentage points with the addition of new indicators.

Thomson said deforestation is linked to a host of abuses, from violating land rights and consent, to violence and threats against human rights defenders.

"Deforestation cannot effectively be eliminated without addressing those human rights abuses," she said.