<p>A man accused of throwing an explosive at Japan's prime minister last month will undergo a three-month psychiatric examination, a regional court said on Tuesday.</p>.<p>Ryuji Kimura, 24, was arrested in April for allegedly hurling a pipe bomb-like explosive toward Fumio Kishida as the premier campaigned in the western city of Wakayama.</p>.<p>Kishida escaped unscathed, but the incident horrified a nation still haunted by the assassination of Japan's former prime minister Shinzo Abe, who was gunned down last year while giving a speech.</p>.<p><strong>Also Read | <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/international/world-news-politics/japanese-atomic-bomb-survivors-worry-zelenskyys-g7-visit-overshadows-nuke-disarmament-message-1220694.html" target="_blank">Japanese atomic bomb survivors worry Zelenskyy's G7 visit overshadows nuke disarmament message</a></strong></p>.<p>Prosecutors are authorised to detain Kimura until early September for an assessment of his mental state at the time of the attack, a court official, who did not give her name, told <em>AFP</em>.</p>.<p>They are expected to decide whether to indict Kimura based on the evaluation.</p>.<p>The suspect has reportedly remained tight-lipped about his motive for the failed attack on Kishida.</p>.<p>Local media reported that Kimura previously filed a lawsuit challenging requirements that political candidates be at least 30 years of age and have a war chest of at least three million yen ($21,600) to run for national office.</p>.<p>An Osaka High Court spokesman told <em>AFP</em> last month that Kimura had sued the government and his claim was rejected by a lower court.</p>.<p>A ruling on his appeal is expected this month.</p>.<p>The attack put Japan on high alert ahead of the Group of Seven summit in Hiroshima, which wrapped up Sunday, and reignited a debate over police security for politicians.</p>.<p>In an interview with foreign media including <em>AFP </em>last month, Kishida said the attack served as a sobering reminder of the difficulties in balancing interactions with voters against the safety of politicians.</p>
<p>A man accused of throwing an explosive at Japan's prime minister last month will undergo a three-month psychiatric examination, a regional court said on Tuesday.</p>.<p>Ryuji Kimura, 24, was arrested in April for allegedly hurling a pipe bomb-like explosive toward Fumio Kishida as the premier campaigned in the western city of Wakayama.</p>.<p>Kishida escaped unscathed, but the incident horrified a nation still haunted by the assassination of Japan's former prime minister Shinzo Abe, who was gunned down last year while giving a speech.</p>.<p><strong>Also Read | <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/international/world-news-politics/japanese-atomic-bomb-survivors-worry-zelenskyys-g7-visit-overshadows-nuke-disarmament-message-1220694.html" target="_blank">Japanese atomic bomb survivors worry Zelenskyy's G7 visit overshadows nuke disarmament message</a></strong></p>.<p>Prosecutors are authorised to detain Kimura until early September for an assessment of his mental state at the time of the attack, a court official, who did not give her name, told <em>AFP</em>.</p>.<p>They are expected to decide whether to indict Kimura based on the evaluation.</p>.<p>The suspect has reportedly remained tight-lipped about his motive for the failed attack on Kishida.</p>.<p>Local media reported that Kimura previously filed a lawsuit challenging requirements that political candidates be at least 30 years of age and have a war chest of at least three million yen ($21,600) to run for national office.</p>.<p>An Osaka High Court spokesman told <em>AFP</em> last month that Kimura had sued the government and his claim was rejected by a lower court.</p>.<p>A ruling on his appeal is expected this month.</p>.<p>The attack put Japan on high alert ahead of the Group of Seven summit in Hiroshima, which wrapped up Sunday, and reignited a debate over police security for politicians.</p>.<p>In an interview with foreign media including <em>AFP </em>last month, Kishida said the attack served as a sobering reminder of the difficulties in balancing interactions with voters against the safety of politicians.</p>