The Supreme Court of India.
Credit: PTI File Photo
New Delhi: In a landmark judgment with far reaching effects, the Supreme Court on Thursday held that there cannot be any caste discrimination in prisons across the country and all present provisions in jail manual perpetuating such discrimination must go.
"The Prison manual 2016 of the central government suffers from lacunae. The manual of 2016 should prohibit classification of prisoners on the basis of caste. Distribution of manual work among prisoners on the basis of their caste hierarchy is discriminatory and unconstitutional," a bench presided over by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud said.
The top court rendered its judgment on a plea filed by Sukanya Shantha, a native of Kalyan in Maharashtra, alleging that prison manuals of some states in the country encouraged caste-based discrimination.
The court directed that the prisoners should not be permitted to clean sewer tanks etc in hazardous conditions, as these practices are of colonial era and most of the laws were framed during British rule.
"The state shall be held liable if violation of Article 23 (Prohibition of traffic in human beings and forced labour) is being done by private individuals. The prisoners can't be made to do inhuman work and be treated inhumanely, hatred, contempt towards the caste based discrimination, and pervasive bias towards such castes," the bench said.
Reading out the excerpts of the judgment, the bench registered a suo motu case of the discrimination inside prisons and directed its registry to list 'In re: discrimination inside prisons' after three months.
It directed all the states to submit a compliance report with this judgment before this Court.
Stressing that the court has to ensure that marginalised people do not suffer, the bench said, this court has held that constitution recognises SC/ST for protective discrimination but caste cannot be used to discriminate against the marginalised and that it should not perpetuate discrimination against oppressed.
"There cannot be such discrimination among prisoners, and segregation among prisoners will not lead to rehabilitation," the bench said.
The court said assigning cleaning and sweeping to marginalised and assigning cooking to higher caste is nothing but violation of Article 15 of the Constitution.
"Such indirect uses of phrases which target so called lower castes cannot be used within our constitutional framework. Prison manuals are only reaffirming such discrimination," the bench said in the order.
Dealing with the issue, the court said that UP Manual provided that a person going under simple imprisonment will not work in degrading and menial work unless his caste is used to do such jobs.
"No group are born as scavenger class or to do or not do menial jobs. Classes who can cook and who cannot cook are aspects of untouchability, which cannot be permitted.," the court said.
The bench held the definition of habitual offenders is problematic under the legislation.
"Several prison manuals or rules notify habitual offenders as members of denotified tribes and thus classification of habitual offenders cannot be to target denotified tribes. All such provisions are held to be unconstitutional," the bench said.