File photo of NewsClick founder Prabir Purkayastha (L) and HR Head Amit Chakravarty being brought to the Lodhi Road Special Cell office, in New Delhi.
Credit: PTI Photo
The Supreme Court on Thursday issued notice to the Delhi Police on a plea by NewsClick founder and Editor-in-chief, Prabir Purkayastha and its HR head, Amit Chakraborty challenging their arrest in a case lodged under anti-terror law the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act.
A bench of Justices B R Gavai and Prashant Kumar Mishra sought a response from the police and fixed the matter for consideration on October 30.
The court initially gave three weeks to the police to file a response. But as senior advocates Kapil Sibal and Devadatt Kamat, for the petitioners, said that they were behind the bars, the court fixed the matter for hearing on October 30.
The bench also said the matter cannot be taken up on Friday, the last working day before the Dussehra break.
The petitioner challenged validity of the Delhi High Court's order of October 13, 2023 which had rejected the petitions filed by accused duo-- Purkayastha and Chakraborty -- challenging their arrest and remand in the UAPA case.
Justice Tushar Rao Gedela had rejected the petitions filed by Purkayastha and Chakraborty challenging the remand order.
According to the prosecution, the accused duo were charged with receiving money to spread pro-China propaganda.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the investigation agency, had claimed the ongoing investigation involved “serious offences” as a huge sum of money, about Rs 75 crore, were received from a person who is staying in China and “the purpose is to ensure that integrity and stability of the country is compromised”.
The High Court had said the petitioners had raised no grievance at all "of an illegal remand order while filing an application seeking a copy of FIR when the remand order was passed on October 04, 2023".
It had also held the Supreme Court's judgement in Pankaj Bansal --for supplying the grounds of arrest by the Enforcement Directorate at the time of arrest -- is not applicable to the facts and the law in the petition.
"The plea challenging the arrest of the present petitioner on the grounds of non furnishing of grounds of arrest are, similarly, held to be untenable and is accordingly rejected," it had said.
The FIR lodged on August 17, 2023 had named Purkayastha and activist Gautam Navalakha and Chinese resident Neville Roy Singham.