Virat Kohli celebrates after the winning the ICC Men's Cricket World Cup 2023 match between India and Bangladesh
Credit: Reuters Photo
In a match where Indian legend Virat Kohli broke seven records and went on to become the leading run scorer in ICC white ball events, the umpire’s decision regarding a non-wide call just before Virat hit his century, has stirred a controversy.
Virat Kohli who scored an unbeaten 103 runs from 97 balls helped India comfortably knock off the target of 258 with 51 balls remaining in the World Cup clash against Bangladesh on October 19.
Kohli was on 97 runs when India needed just 2 runs to bring the match home in the 42nd over which was being bowled by Bangladesh’s left-arm spinner Nasum Ahmed. The first ball which went down the leg-side, was not signalled a wide by the match umpire Richard Kettleborough. Kohli played a dot on the next ball before hitting a six on the 3rd ball of the over, to finish both; his century and the match.
Some have raised their eyebrows over the non-wide call by the umpire on the first ball, saying he helped the Indian batter reach his century.
Many believed that Kettleborough had made the decision to give Virat Kohli a chance to reach to his century rather than to reduce the odds of him doing so, for which the umpire has been criticised.
However, it is possible that the non-wide call made by the umpire was because of the changes done in the Laws of Cricket by the MCC in 2022 and not because he was a fan of the Indian batter.
Before the change to the law, clause 22.1.1 in the MCC Laws of Cricket, which talks about Judging a Wide, states: “If the bowler bowls a ball, not being a No ball, the umpire shall adjudge it a Wide if, according to the definition in 22.1.2, the ball passes wide of where the striker is standing and which also would have passed wide of the striker standing in a normal guard position.”
In March 2022, the MCC announced a new Code of Laws set to take effect from October 1, thus affecting Clause 22.1.
“In the modern game, batters are, more than ever, moving laterally around the crease before the ball is bowled. It was felt unfair that a delivery might be called ‘Wide’ if it passes where the batter had stood as the bowler entered his/her delivery stride.” read a statement from the MCC.
“Therefore, Law 22.1 has been amended so that a Wide will apply to where the batter is standing, where the striker has stood at any point since the bowler began their run up, and which would also have passed wide of the striker in a normal batting position.”
Looking at Virat’s stance, who planted his front foot further towards the leg side than it is when the ball passes by him, suggests that the umpire took this into account before deciding th ball as not a wide.
Some said Bangladesh was trying to bowl a wide so that Virat doesn’t reach his ton. Bangladesh captain Najmul Hossain Shanto, has denied the claims and said that there was so no such intentional bowling of a wide from their side.