<p>Ahead of the presentation of the <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/union-budget-2023" target="_blank">Union Budget 2023 </a>on February 1, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Tuesday tabled the <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/business/union-budget/economic-survey-2022-23-read-full-text-here-1186305.html" target="_blank">Economic Survey 2022-23</a> in Parliament.</p>.<p>As per the Economic Survey, the aggregate State and Central taxes subsumed in the GST exhibited a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 11.53 per cent in the pre-GST period (FY13 to FY17).</p>.<p>The nominal GDP grew at a CAGR of 11.54 per cent during this period.</p>.<p>Since the growth of the subsumed taxes was marginally less than the growth of GDP, the buoyancy was just below one and could be taken as one for practical purposes. </p>.<p><strong>Also Read | <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/business/union-budget/economic-survey-2023-major-reforms-in-union-budget-over-the-last-4-years-1186340.html" target="_blank">Economic Survey 2023: Major reforms in Union Budget over the last 4 years</a></strong></p>.<p>The post-GST period experienced many headwinds, most notably the shock of the Covid pandemic.</p>.<p>The nominal GDP grew at a slower CAGR of 9.6 per cent in the post-GST years (FY19 to FY23). However, GST collections have grown at a CAGR of 10.9 per cent, implying aggregate GST collections buoyancy of around 1.1.</p>.<p>This has occurred even though the effective GST rate has fallen from inception (from 14.4 per cent in 2017 to 11.6 per cent in 2019, according to RBI).</p>.<p>Improved tax collection efficiency was one of the main arguments in favour of GST.</p>.<p>The evidence so far suggests that GST is indeed showing a higher buoyancy than the pre-GST system. This augurs well for future resource mobilisation in the economy. </p>
<p>Ahead of the presentation of the <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/union-budget-2023" target="_blank">Union Budget 2023 </a>on February 1, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Tuesday tabled the <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/business/union-budget/economic-survey-2022-23-read-full-text-here-1186305.html" target="_blank">Economic Survey 2022-23</a> in Parliament.</p>.<p>As per the Economic Survey, the aggregate State and Central taxes subsumed in the GST exhibited a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 11.53 per cent in the pre-GST period (FY13 to FY17).</p>.<p>The nominal GDP grew at a CAGR of 11.54 per cent during this period.</p>.<p>Since the growth of the subsumed taxes was marginally less than the growth of GDP, the buoyancy was just below one and could be taken as one for practical purposes. </p>.<p><strong>Also Read | <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/business/union-budget/economic-survey-2023-major-reforms-in-union-budget-over-the-last-4-years-1186340.html" target="_blank">Economic Survey 2023: Major reforms in Union Budget over the last 4 years</a></strong></p>.<p>The post-GST period experienced many headwinds, most notably the shock of the Covid pandemic.</p>.<p>The nominal GDP grew at a slower CAGR of 9.6 per cent in the post-GST years (FY19 to FY23). However, GST collections have grown at a CAGR of 10.9 per cent, implying aggregate GST collections buoyancy of around 1.1.</p>.<p>This has occurred even though the effective GST rate has fallen from inception (from 14.4 per cent in 2017 to 11.6 per cent in 2019, according to RBI).</p>.<p>Improved tax collection efficiency was one of the main arguments in favour of GST.</p>.<p>The evidence so far suggests that GST is indeed showing a higher buoyancy than the pre-GST system. This augurs well for future resource mobilisation in the economy. </p>