<p>The links between gender, income, and the choice of transportation modes have not been widely studied in developing countries. </p>.<p>Researchers at the Indian Institute of Science’s (IISc) Sustainable Transportation Lab have tried to address the gaps by identifying policies that could shape a more equitable modal split in Bengaluru. </p>.<p>The study found a grouping of 19 planning, economic, regulatory and IT policy interventions as most effective for both genders in reducing the use of cars and two-wheelers while increasing the mode share of public transport (PT) and non-motorable transport (NMT).</p>.<p>The interventions, tested in isolation and combinations, included increasing PT coverage, discounted fares for women in PT, defining car-restricted zones, and improving real-time information of PT systems. Four gender-income groups — low, lower-mid, upper-mid, and high — were studied in the Bengaluru Metropolitan Region. </p>.<p>Researchers Ubaid Illahi, Gayathri Harihara Subramanian and Prof Ashish Verma contended that policy interventions limited to individual transport modes could prove inadequate in developing a comprehensive, gender- and income-inclusive mobility model. </p>.<p>Low-income and lower mid-income women were found to have shares significantly higher than men in bus, metro and walk modes. While men across income groups preferred two-wheelers, a good proportion of upper-income men were found using the metro, indicating that reliability influenced their choice. </p>.<p class="CrossHead"><strong>Actionable findings</strong></p>.<p>The study, done as part of a project titled Institutionalising Gender Smart and Gender Astute Mobility, had funding support from the Directorate of Urban Land Transport, Government of Karnataka.</p>.<p>“The findings are pointers to Urban Local Bodies and agencies entrusted with diverse aspects of planning, be it buses, the metro, or the footpaths, to adopt gender-inclusive models,” Prof Verma told <span class="italic">DH</span>. </p>.<p>Improving surveillance, design and safety measures could increase the mode share of walking for women (+0.499 per cent). </p>.<p>With improved NMT infrastructure, women are more likely to walk (+1.36 per cent), while men are more likely to cycle (+0.26 per cent). Dedicated bus lanes were found to cause a +1.67 per cent shift among women toward buses. </p>.<p>The researchers said affordability was key to promoting PT and NMT but it came with the risk of people switching to unsustainable transport modes when their incomes improve.</p>.<p>Identifying deterrents — women, for instance, could be avoiding two-wheelers because of a higher possibility of accidents, and pollution — will be critical in devising transportation policies. </p>.<p>“Even a 1 per cent shift towards public transport could mean that a significant number of private vehicles are taken off the roads,” Prof Verma said. A sustainable modal split in Bengaluru could have an 80 per cent combined share of PT, cycling and walking modes, he said. </p>
<p>The links between gender, income, and the choice of transportation modes have not been widely studied in developing countries. </p>.<p>Researchers at the Indian Institute of Science’s (IISc) Sustainable Transportation Lab have tried to address the gaps by identifying policies that could shape a more equitable modal split in Bengaluru. </p>.<p>The study found a grouping of 19 planning, economic, regulatory and IT policy interventions as most effective for both genders in reducing the use of cars and two-wheelers while increasing the mode share of public transport (PT) and non-motorable transport (NMT).</p>.<p>The interventions, tested in isolation and combinations, included increasing PT coverage, discounted fares for women in PT, defining car-restricted zones, and improving real-time information of PT systems. Four gender-income groups — low, lower-mid, upper-mid, and high — were studied in the Bengaluru Metropolitan Region. </p>.<p>Researchers Ubaid Illahi, Gayathri Harihara Subramanian and Prof Ashish Verma contended that policy interventions limited to individual transport modes could prove inadequate in developing a comprehensive, gender- and income-inclusive mobility model. </p>.<p>Low-income and lower mid-income women were found to have shares significantly higher than men in bus, metro and walk modes. While men across income groups preferred two-wheelers, a good proportion of upper-income men were found using the metro, indicating that reliability influenced their choice. </p>.<p class="CrossHead"><strong>Actionable findings</strong></p>.<p>The study, done as part of a project titled Institutionalising Gender Smart and Gender Astute Mobility, had funding support from the Directorate of Urban Land Transport, Government of Karnataka.</p>.<p>“The findings are pointers to Urban Local Bodies and agencies entrusted with diverse aspects of planning, be it buses, the metro, or the footpaths, to adopt gender-inclusive models,” Prof Verma told <span class="italic">DH</span>. </p>.<p>Improving surveillance, design and safety measures could increase the mode share of walking for women (+0.499 per cent). </p>.<p>With improved NMT infrastructure, women are more likely to walk (+1.36 per cent), while men are more likely to cycle (+0.26 per cent). Dedicated bus lanes were found to cause a +1.67 per cent shift among women toward buses. </p>.<p>The researchers said affordability was key to promoting PT and NMT but it came with the risk of people switching to unsustainable transport modes when their incomes improve.</p>.<p>Identifying deterrents — women, for instance, could be avoiding two-wheelers because of a higher possibility of accidents, and pollution — will be critical in devising transportation policies. </p>.<p>“Even a 1 per cent shift towards public transport could mean that a significant number of private vehicles are taken off the roads,” Prof Verma said. A sustainable modal split in Bengaluru could have an 80 per cent combined share of PT, cycling and walking modes, he said. </p>