<p>Maharashtra may be headed for a brief spell of President’s rule as the Shiv Sena and the BJP remained deadlocked over the power-sharing deal, leaders from the state said in New Delhi on Tuesday.</p>.<p>Though there was speculation about the NCP taking the lead in providing an alternative if the BJP-Shiv Sena fail to deliver a government, Congress president Sonia Gandhi remained firm on her opposition to any initiative featuring the Sena.</p>.<p>And no climbdown was visible from the Maharashtra BJP unit, whose core committee met in Mumbai on Tuesday and said a BJP-Sena government under the leadership of Devendra Fadnavis would be formed, a signal that the party was in no mood to relent.</p>.<p>With no rapprochement between the saffron allies in sight, the ball is in Governor Bhagat Singh Koshyari’s court now.</p>.<p>“There could be a brief spell of President’s rule in the state if Sena-BJP fail to resolve their differences by November 9,” a senior Maharashtra leader said. The term of the outgoing Assembly ends on November 9.</p>.<p>If a new government is not formed before that, the Governor might recommend President’s rule.</p>.<p>Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, who met BJP President Amit Shah on Monday, returned to Mumbai on Tuesday morning without meeting Prime Minister Narendra Modi. </p>.<p>Political circles were abuzz about the top BJP leadership being unhappy over Fadnavis’ handling of the post-poll situation in Maharashtra and have left it to him to sort out the mess with its oldest ally — Shiv Sena.</p>.<p>It is being said that Uddhav Thackeray has taken objection to Fadnavis’ statement that Shah had not agreed to a 50-50 power sharing deal.</p>.<p>But the BJP, too, is in a sort of bind, as a section of the BJP believes that breaking the alliance with the Shiv Sena would not send a good signal and that Fadnavis may have to take the lead in smoothening the ruffled feathers of its alliance partner.</p>.<p>The first signals of a retreat were seen when BJP sources indicated that they were not averse to sharing equally the ministries with the Shiv Sena.</p>.<p>A Union Minister said the chances of BJP forming a minority government were slim as such an endeavour was bound to fail at the stage of the election of Speaker.</p>.<p>“Shiv Sena and BJP have to talk and sort out their differences for the betterment of Maharashtra,” the minister said.</p>.<p>In Mumbai, state BJP President and Revenue Minister Chandrakant Patil said people of Maharashtra had given mandate to MahaYuti - comprising BJP, Sena and smaller allies RPI (Athawale), Rashtriya Samaj Paksha, Shiv Sangram and RayatKranti Sangathana - and they would form the government.</p>.<p>Stating that the BJP would take “everyone along”, Patil said the party central leadership had approved the formation of the next government under Fadnavis.</p>.<p>On the other hand, Shiv Sena maintained the CM would be from their party. “The Chief Minister will only from the Shiv Sena,” said Rajya Sabha member Sanjay Raut, a close aide of Uddhav. </p>
<p>Maharashtra may be headed for a brief spell of President’s rule as the Shiv Sena and the BJP remained deadlocked over the power-sharing deal, leaders from the state said in New Delhi on Tuesday.</p>.<p>Though there was speculation about the NCP taking the lead in providing an alternative if the BJP-Shiv Sena fail to deliver a government, Congress president Sonia Gandhi remained firm on her opposition to any initiative featuring the Sena.</p>.<p>And no climbdown was visible from the Maharashtra BJP unit, whose core committee met in Mumbai on Tuesday and said a BJP-Sena government under the leadership of Devendra Fadnavis would be formed, a signal that the party was in no mood to relent.</p>.<p>With no rapprochement between the saffron allies in sight, the ball is in Governor Bhagat Singh Koshyari’s court now.</p>.<p>“There could be a brief spell of President’s rule in the state if Sena-BJP fail to resolve their differences by November 9,” a senior Maharashtra leader said. The term of the outgoing Assembly ends on November 9.</p>.<p>If a new government is not formed before that, the Governor might recommend President’s rule.</p>.<p>Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, who met BJP President Amit Shah on Monday, returned to Mumbai on Tuesday morning without meeting Prime Minister Narendra Modi. </p>.<p>Political circles were abuzz about the top BJP leadership being unhappy over Fadnavis’ handling of the post-poll situation in Maharashtra and have left it to him to sort out the mess with its oldest ally — Shiv Sena.</p>.<p>It is being said that Uddhav Thackeray has taken objection to Fadnavis’ statement that Shah had not agreed to a 50-50 power sharing deal.</p>.<p>But the BJP, too, is in a sort of bind, as a section of the BJP believes that breaking the alliance with the Shiv Sena would not send a good signal and that Fadnavis may have to take the lead in smoothening the ruffled feathers of its alliance partner.</p>.<p>The first signals of a retreat were seen when BJP sources indicated that they were not averse to sharing equally the ministries with the Shiv Sena.</p>.<p>A Union Minister said the chances of BJP forming a minority government were slim as such an endeavour was bound to fail at the stage of the election of Speaker.</p>.<p>“Shiv Sena and BJP have to talk and sort out their differences for the betterment of Maharashtra,” the minister said.</p>.<p>In Mumbai, state BJP President and Revenue Minister Chandrakant Patil said people of Maharashtra had given mandate to MahaYuti - comprising BJP, Sena and smaller allies RPI (Athawale), Rashtriya Samaj Paksha, Shiv Sangram and RayatKranti Sangathana - and they would form the government.</p>.<p>Stating that the BJP would take “everyone along”, Patil said the party central leadership had approved the formation of the next government under Fadnavis.</p>.<p>On the other hand, Shiv Sena maintained the CM would be from their party. “The Chief Minister will only from the Shiv Sena,” said Rajya Sabha member Sanjay Raut, a close aide of Uddhav. </p>