<p>Amid an ongoing hearing in the Supreme Court over appointment of election commissioners, Law Minister Kiren Rijiju on Friday said a judge must speak through his judgment as his observations could lead to a "difficult situation".</p>.<p>"Then people will ask how did the collegium select a particular person to be appointed as a judge," he said at the <em>Times Now Summit </em>responding to a question on the Supreme Court wanting to know how the law minister had chosen a particular election commissioner.</p>.<p>"This question will lead to difficult situation. So that is why I said the old wisdom -- a judge must speak through his judgment," he remarked.</p>.<p><strong>Also Read | <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/national/government-cant-make-ec-dance-to-its-tunes-rijiju-1163286.html" target="_blank">Government can't make EC 'dance' to its tunes: Rijiju</a></strong></p>.<p>He said certain "commentary" made by judges make headlines, but the reported observations do not form part of the judgment.</p>.<p>The Supreme Court had on Thursday questioned the "haste" and "tearing hurry" with which the Centre appointed ex-bureaucrat Arun Goel as an election commissioner, saying his file travelled at "lightning speed" within departments in 24-hours.</p>.<p>The central government vehemently resisted the observations, with Attorney General R Venkataramani contending the whole issue pertaining to his appointment needed to be looked at in entirety.</p>.<p>The top court asked how the Union law minister shortlisted a panel of four names that was recommended to the prime minister for appointment as election commissioner when none of them would have completed the stipulated six-year tenure in office.</p>.<p>The top court on Thursday reserved its verdict on a batch of pleas seeking a collegium-like system for the appointment of ECs and the CEC and asked the parties to file written submission in five days.</p>
<p>Amid an ongoing hearing in the Supreme Court over appointment of election commissioners, Law Minister Kiren Rijiju on Friday said a judge must speak through his judgment as his observations could lead to a "difficult situation".</p>.<p>"Then people will ask how did the collegium select a particular person to be appointed as a judge," he said at the <em>Times Now Summit </em>responding to a question on the Supreme Court wanting to know how the law minister had chosen a particular election commissioner.</p>.<p>"This question will lead to difficult situation. So that is why I said the old wisdom -- a judge must speak through his judgment," he remarked.</p>.<p><strong>Also Read | <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/national/government-cant-make-ec-dance-to-its-tunes-rijiju-1163286.html" target="_blank">Government can't make EC 'dance' to its tunes: Rijiju</a></strong></p>.<p>He said certain "commentary" made by judges make headlines, but the reported observations do not form part of the judgment.</p>.<p>The Supreme Court had on Thursday questioned the "haste" and "tearing hurry" with which the Centre appointed ex-bureaucrat Arun Goel as an election commissioner, saying his file travelled at "lightning speed" within departments in 24-hours.</p>.<p>The central government vehemently resisted the observations, with Attorney General R Venkataramani contending the whole issue pertaining to his appointment needed to be looked at in entirety.</p>.<p>The top court asked how the Union law minister shortlisted a panel of four names that was recommended to the prime minister for appointment as election commissioner when none of them would have completed the stipulated six-year tenure in office.</p>.<p>The top court on Thursday reserved its verdict on a batch of pleas seeking a collegium-like system for the appointment of ECs and the CEC and asked the parties to file written submission in five days.</p>