Ahead of the historic Ram temple 'bhoomi pujan' ceremony, a timeline of the Ayodhya Ramjanmabhoomi dispute

The long saga of political and social turmoil over the demolition of Babri Masjid and the demand to build Ram Temple in Ayodhya will finally come to an end on August 5. The Ram Temple's 'bhoomi pujan' will put an end to decades-long battle as the ceremony would mark the formal commencement of the much-promised mandir's construction.

Ayodhya is decked up for the 'bhoomi pujan' at the Ram Janmabhoomi. The Trust has invited 175 guests, who figure in a select list of seers and politicians topped by Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Concerned over the spread of coronavirus, the authorities are encouraging others not to come to the temple town, asking them to mark the occasion by celebrating at their homes.

Follow latest updates on Ram Temple 'bhoomi pujan' in Ayodhya here

As the historic moment will mark an end to the decades-long battle, DH recaps the important landmarks that have brought the Ayodhya dispute to where it is today.

1992

December 6 - Babri Masjid demolished by some 2,00,000 karsevaks.

December 16 - The Liberhan Ayodhya Commission of Inquiry was set up by the Congress government headed by PV Narasimha Rao.

1993

April 3 - Acquisition of Certain Area at Ayodhya Act is passed due to the acquisition of land in the disputed area.

Also read — Ram Mandir bhoomi pujan's muhurta time and more

Ismail Faruqui and others file a written petition challenging some aspects of the act.

1994

The Supreme Court in the Ismail Faruqui case says that ‘Mosque’ is not integral to Islam owing to the fact that ‘Namaz’ can be offered anywhere.

2002

The three-judge bench begins hearing on determining who the land belongs to. The Archaeological Survey of India is directed to verify the presence of a temple in the site of Babri Masjid.

2003

In the Mohd. Aslam Alias Bhure vs. Union of India & Others case, Supreme Court says that no religious activity shall be conducted in the disputed land.

Archaeological Survey of India finds evidence of the presence of a temple under the mosque. The findings are disputed by Muslim organisations.

Also read — Ram Lalla's own tailors in Ayodhya

2009

June 30 - Liberhan Commission submits its final report. The findings of the report, however, weren't made public.

2010

The High Court rules that the disputed land be divided into three parts. One-third of the allotted to Ram Lalla Virajman, who was represented by the Akhil Bharatiya Hindu Mahasabha, one-third would go to the Sunni Waqf Board and the remaining one-third to the Nirmohi Akhara.

The case moves on to the Supreme Court following the verdict by the High Court.

2011

May 9 - Supreme Court stays the High Court order.

2016

Subramanian Swamy files plea to the Supreme Court for the construction of a Hindu temple in the disputed land.

Also read — 'Rath charioteer’ Advani said temple symbolises struggle between ‘genuine’ and ‘pseudo’ secularism

2017

March 21 - The Supreme Court suggests out of court settlement.

May 30 - Murli Manohar Joshi, Uma Bharti, L K Advani and Vinay Katiyar are all charged with criminal conspiracy to demolish the Babri Masjid.

August 8 - UP Shia Central Waqf Board tells the Supreme Court that the mosque can be constructed at a close distance to the demolition site.

August 11 - The Supreme Court schedules hearing of 13 appeals in the title dispute on December 5, 2017.

November 20 - UP Shia Central Waqf board tells Supreme Court that temple can be built in Ayodhya and a mosque in Lucknow.

December 1 - 32 civil rights activists file a plea to the Supreme Court challenging the verdict of 2010 Allahabad case.

December 5 - The final hearings in the Ayodhya land dispute begin. The bench includes former Chief Justice of India Dipak Mishra.

2018

February 8 - Supreme Court begins the hearings for the civil appeals.

March 14 - Supreme Court rejects interim pleas. Tells them to intervene as parties in the case. The interim pleas include the one from Subramanian Swamy.

April 6 - Rajeev Dhavan files a plea to the Supreme Court requesting for the 1994 judgement to be referred to a five-judge bench.
September 27 - Supreme Court declines the request for constituting a larger bench. The case would move forward with a three-judge bench.

October 29 - A three-judge bench, headed by current CJI Ranjan Gogoi, says that “the appropriate Bench will fix the schedule with regard to the hearing of appeals in the case”.

2019

January 4 - A two-judge bench says that an ‘appropriate bench’ will take up the case from January 10.

January 8 - The Supreme Court notifies that a five-judge bench will take up the case moving forward. The bench, headed by Ranjan Gogoi, would consist of India's five most senior Supreme Court judges.

January 20 - Justice UU Lalit recuses himself and the hearing is postponed.

January 29 - The hearing gets postponed again as Justices Ashok Bhushan and S Abdul Nazeer are replaced with Justices NV Ramana and UU Lalit.

February 26 - A court-monitored mediation process between the parties involved is proposed by the Supreme Court.

March 8 - Justice F M I Kalifulla, as Chairman, spiritual leader Sri Sri Ravishankar and senior advocate Sriram Panchu are chosen as the mediators for the Ayodhya land dispute.

May 10 - The three-member mediation team submits the final report to the Supreme Court.

September-October 2019: The Supreme Court hears several appeals for 40 days and reserve judgment.

In Pics | How Ayodhya is being decked up for Ram Temple 'bhoomi pujan'

November 11, 2019 - The Supreme Court delivered the much-awaited verdict. They dismissed the appeal of the Shia Waqf Board in the politically sensitive Ram Janmbhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute case in Ayodhya and held that the land belongs to the government as per revenue records. Then, the apex court said in its verdict in the politically-sensitive case of Ram Janmbhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute in Ayodhya that the Nirmohi Akhara is not a shebait or devotee of the deity Ram Lalla.

Finally, in a historic judgement, the Supreme Court gave the disputed land to Hindus, while Muslim parties will get alternate land. According to SC, there is no evidence that Muslims abandoned mosque. Hindus always believed that the birthplace of Lord Ram was in the inner courtyard of the mosque. It has been clearly established that Muslims offered prayer inside the inner courtyard and Hindus offered prayers in the outer courtyard. The apex court gave Centre three months to set up a trust. Once it is formed, the government will hand over the land to the trust. Sunni Waqf Board to get 5 acres of land in a prominent place in Ayodhya.