The FIR alleged that family members of high-ranking government officials and prominent politicians, including those of the ruling party, were the main beneficiaries of the recruitment.
Five family members of Sonwani -- including son Nitesh and daughter-in-law Nisha Kosale as deputy collectors, elder brother's son Sahil as Deputy SP, daughter-in-law Deepa Adil as District Excise Officer, and sister's daughter Sunita Joshi as Labour Officer -- were beneficiaries in the recruitment exercise, it alleged.
"It has been further alleged that then Secretary (Dhruv) of Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission, Chhattisgarh, got selected his son (Sumit) to the post of Deputy Collector," a CBI Spokesperson said.
The complaint, now part of the CBI FIR, alleged that candidates making it in the merit from serial numbers 1-171 are allegedly related to government officials, politicians and influential persons.
It lists Deputy Collectors including Chhattisgarh Governor's Secretary Amrit Kumar Xalxo's son Nikhil and daughter Neha, Bastar Naxal Operations DIG PL Dhruv's daughter Sakshi, a Congress leader's daughter Ananya Agarwal, senior Congress leader Sudhir Katiyar's daughter Bhumika Katiyar and son-in-law Sashank Goyal, Congress leader Rajendra Shukla's daughter Swarnim Shukla and son of a senior Congress leader Rajendra Kumar Kaushik.
Relatives of Congress leaders' aides, including Pragya Nayak, who was selected as Deputy Collector; Prakhar Nayak, who was chosen as Financial Services Officer; and Khushboo Bijoura, who was selected as Deputy Collector, were also beneficiaries of the alleged scam, the complaint alleged.
It has alleged that if the relatives of a Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission official appear in the examination, then the concerned person has to recuse himself from the process after informing other members and officials of the Commission, which Sonwani did not do.
It is alleged that Sonwani violated the rules and selected his family members and relatives of other officials and influential persons, which is considered "corruption".
"The candidates who scored well in the examination are relatives of the PSC officials, government officials and politicians. It shows that the candidates were provided the examination paper in advance, enabling them to score well and get good ranks in the results," the complaint alleged.