<p class="title">A crucial consultation ahead of the framing of the country's data protection laws witnessed animated discussions here on Saturday.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Participants raised a variety of concerns. Held on the IISc campus, it discussed everything from revenge porn and human genomics to artificial intelligence and the right to be forgotten.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Cybersecurity experts, academics, lawyers and others attended the day-long event.</p>.<p class="bodytext">They made their submissions to the Srikrishna Committee, formed on July 31 last year to frame principles for data protection laws. </p>.<p class="bodytext">The session was chaired by Justice B N Srikrishna, retired Supreme Court judge. Also on the panel were Rama Vedashree, CEO, Data Security Council of India, and Gopalakrishnan S.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The basis of the discussion was a 200-page document drafted by the nine members of the Srikrishna Committee. January 31 is the deadline to respond to the committee's white paper.</p>.<p class="CrossHead">Classification of data</p>.<p class="bodytext">Several dystopian scenarios, such as profiling and discrimination with the help of <br />behavioural and psychometric data, led to discussions on the need for classification of data types.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Darshana, a lawyer from the People's Union of Civil Liberties (PUCL), spoke about how people were being denied rations for not holding Aadhaar.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The collection of children's biometric data brought up the question of consent.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Srikrishna clarified the white paper contained a chapter on consent: it suggests an age limit below which parental consent will have to be mandatory.</p>.<p class="bodytext">A discussion on the right to be forgotten arose after some participants sought a provision to revoke consent already given.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Questions associated with genome sequencing were raised by Vijay Chandru, professor, IISc.</p>.<p class="bodytext">"We need to pay special attention to this type of information. The collection of DNA in the form of saliva, when, say, you make a visit to a weight loss clinic, has become the commercial norm. The Insurance Regulatory Act can have huge implications as genetic data can be used to discriminate and deny health coverage," Chandru said.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Sunil Abraham, head of the Centre for Internet and Society, said he was delighted with the quality of debate and discussion.</p>.<p class="byline">DH News Service</p>
<p class="title">A crucial consultation ahead of the framing of the country's data protection laws witnessed animated discussions here on Saturday.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Participants raised a variety of concerns. Held on the IISc campus, it discussed everything from revenge porn and human genomics to artificial intelligence and the right to be forgotten.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Cybersecurity experts, academics, lawyers and others attended the day-long event.</p>.<p class="bodytext">They made their submissions to the Srikrishna Committee, formed on July 31 last year to frame principles for data protection laws. </p>.<p class="bodytext">The session was chaired by Justice B N Srikrishna, retired Supreme Court judge. Also on the panel were Rama Vedashree, CEO, Data Security Council of India, and Gopalakrishnan S.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The basis of the discussion was a 200-page document drafted by the nine members of the Srikrishna Committee. January 31 is the deadline to respond to the committee's white paper.</p>.<p class="CrossHead">Classification of data</p>.<p class="bodytext">Several dystopian scenarios, such as profiling and discrimination with the help of <br />behavioural and psychometric data, led to discussions on the need for classification of data types.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Darshana, a lawyer from the People's Union of Civil Liberties (PUCL), spoke about how people were being denied rations for not holding Aadhaar.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The collection of children's biometric data brought up the question of consent.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Srikrishna clarified the white paper contained a chapter on consent: it suggests an age limit below which parental consent will have to be mandatory.</p>.<p class="bodytext">A discussion on the right to be forgotten arose after some participants sought a provision to revoke consent already given.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Questions associated with genome sequencing were raised by Vijay Chandru, professor, IISc.</p>.<p class="bodytext">"We need to pay special attention to this type of information. The collection of DNA in the form of saliva, when, say, you make a visit to a weight loss clinic, has become the commercial norm. The Insurance Regulatory Act can have huge implications as genetic data can be used to discriminate and deny health coverage," Chandru said.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Sunil Abraham, head of the Centre for Internet and Society, said he was delighted with the quality of debate and discussion.</p>.<p class="byline">DH News Service</p>