<p>Mysuru: The Mysuru Urban Development Authority has allotted a an alternative site on 50:50 basis to one A Papanna, the father of former Zilla Panchayat member Rakesh Papanna, said to be a close confidant of Chief Minister <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/tags/siddaramaiah">Siddaramaiah</a>. </p>.<p>MUDA had issued a notification in 1981 acquiring 3 acres 5 guntas in survey number 211 of Hinkal village, Mysuru taluk for the formation of Vijayanagara layout. However, the owner of the land did not accept the compensation and approached court.</p>.<p>In 1999, a compensation of Rs 48,750 was fixed for the land. Meanwhile, the land owner approached the court and did not receive the compensation. The court had directed MUDA to pay a suitable compensation.</p>.<p>Meanwhile, Papanna made an application to MUDA on April 15, 2024, seeking compensation and on June 12, the MUDA commissioner allotted him sites totally measuring 36,753 square feet in Vijayanagara layout.</p>.MUDA site row calls for impartial inquiry.<p>It is alleged that MUDA could have paid the compensation along with interest to the land loser in accordance with the court orders.</p>.<p>The government issued a clear instruction in October 2023 stating that alternative sites must not be allotted on 50:50 basis.</p>.<p>Muda chairman K Marigowda said that Papanna was allotted the site on the directions of the court. “After verification, some lapses have been found. The government has withheld this site - and all the sites allotted in 50:50 basis. The investigation team will look into the matter and submit a report to the government,” he said.</p>
<p>Mysuru: The Mysuru Urban Development Authority has allotted a an alternative site on 50:50 basis to one A Papanna, the father of former Zilla Panchayat member Rakesh Papanna, said to be a close confidant of Chief Minister <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/tags/siddaramaiah">Siddaramaiah</a>. </p>.<p>MUDA had issued a notification in 1981 acquiring 3 acres 5 guntas in survey number 211 of Hinkal village, Mysuru taluk for the formation of Vijayanagara layout. However, the owner of the land did not accept the compensation and approached court.</p>.<p>In 1999, a compensation of Rs 48,750 was fixed for the land. Meanwhile, the land owner approached the court and did not receive the compensation. The court had directed MUDA to pay a suitable compensation.</p>.<p>Meanwhile, Papanna made an application to MUDA on April 15, 2024, seeking compensation and on June 12, the MUDA commissioner allotted him sites totally measuring 36,753 square feet in Vijayanagara layout.</p>.MUDA site row calls for impartial inquiry.<p>It is alleged that MUDA could have paid the compensation along with interest to the land loser in accordance with the court orders.</p>.<p>The government issued a clear instruction in October 2023 stating that alternative sites must not be allotted on 50:50 basis.</p>.<p>Muda chairman K Marigowda said that Papanna was allotted the site on the directions of the court. “After verification, some lapses have been found. The government has withheld this site - and all the sites allotted in 50:50 basis. The investigation team will look into the matter and submit a report to the government,” he said.</p>