<p class="bodytext">Taking a strong stance against the state government for its failure to comply with orders, the High Court has directed the state government to deposit a cost of Rs 5 lakh in a contempt proceeding. The complaint was pertaining to non-payment of salary increments to a retired employee with the Department of Public Libraries.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The contempt petition, filed by V A Nagamani, had approached the HC in 2014, seeking parity of pay scale with that of the Library Assistants working in the Department of Public Libraries. On October 14, 2020, the single bench had directed the state government to extend the benefits to her as per the government order dated October 12, 2006 within a period of two months. The petitioner filed a contempt petition after the authorities failed to comply with the order. A division bench comprising Chief Justice Prasanna B Varale and Justice Krishna S Dixit had issued notice on December 1, 2023. During the hearing on Tuesday, the state government filed a memo seeking further time of six weeks on the grounds that a proposal has been sent to the Finance department.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The bench observed that even three years after the court direction, the state government could not comply as per its own order issued in 2006. “As a right, people come to the court. Orders are made, but they are not obeyed. A simple direction was issued to extend the benefit to this petitioner. It took three years. The party first has to approach this court. Even after the favourable order, again the petitioner has to file contempt petition,” Justice Krishna Dixit orally said. Justice Dixit further said, “People are unhappy with our courts. Go to any park and listen to what people talk about our courts. This litigant has fought for 10 years. We know that the government doesn’t understand soft language.”</p>.Karnataka High Court strikes down ordinance providing 100% reservation for women in military nursing jobs.<p class="bodytext">The bench said that it hoped against the hope that the order would be complied with.</p>.<p class="bodytext">“This approach of the state government certainly prompts this court to grant only 3 weeks’ time subject to the state depositing cost of Rs 5 lakh in this court within two weeks from today. As there are as many as six respondents - accused and every accused is occupying a responsible position in the state government, the government may recover the amount of cost from the erring officers by fixing the responsibilities on such erring officers. A copy of the order be forwarded to the Chief Secretary,” the bench said.</p>
<p class="bodytext">Taking a strong stance against the state government for its failure to comply with orders, the High Court has directed the state government to deposit a cost of Rs 5 lakh in a contempt proceeding. The complaint was pertaining to non-payment of salary increments to a retired employee with the Department of Public Libraries.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The contempt petition, filed by V A Nagamani, had approached the HC in 2014, seeking parity of pay scale with that of the Library Assistants working in the Department of Public Libraries. On October 14, 2020, the single bench had directed the state government to extend the benefits to her as per the government order dated October 12, 2006 within a period of two months. The petitioner filed a contempt petition after the authorities failed to comply with the order. A division bench comprising Chief Justice Prasanna B Varale and Justice Krishna S Dixit had issued notice on December 1, 2023. During the hearing on Tuesday, the state government filed a memo seeking further time of six weeks on the grounds that a proposal has been sent to the Finance department.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The bench observed that even three years after the court direction, the state government could not comply as per its own order issued in 2006. “As a right, people come to the court. Orders are made, but they are not obeyed. A simple direction was issued to extend the benefit to this petitioner. It took three years. The party first has to approach this court. Even after the favourable order, again the petitioner has to file contempt petition,” Justice Krishna Dixit orally said. Justice Dixit further said, “People are unhappy with our courts. Go to any park and listen to what people talk about our courts. This litigant has fought for 10 years. We know that the government doesn’t understand soft language.”</p>.Karnataka High Court strikes down ordinance providing 100% reservation for women in military nursing jobs.<p class="bodytext">The bench said that it hoped against the hope that the order would be complied with.</p>.<p class="bodytext">“This approach of the state government certainly prompts this court to grant only 3 weeks’ time subject to the state depositing cost of Rs 5 lakh in this court within two weeks from today. As there are as many as six respondents - accused and every accused is occupying a responsible position in the state government, the government may recover the amount of cost from the erring officers by fixing the responsibilities on such erring officers. A copy of the order be forwarded to the Chief Secretary,” the bench said.</p>