<p>The Supreme Court on Wednesday declined to come to the rescue of a Karnataka government officer, who was dismissed from service for illegally granting more than 134 acres of forest land to some 30 people as a tahsildar in Kolar district.</p>.<p class="bodytext">A bench of Justices Madan B Lokur and Deepak Gupta dismissed a petition filed by E Ramakrishnappa against the Karnataka High Court’s judgement of March 26, 2018, that had declined to interfere with the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal’s order.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The tribunal had rejected an application by the officer, then working as undersecretary, against his dismissal on August 27, 2013.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Advocate S N Bhat, representing Ramakrishnappa, contended no charge for personal gain was made against the petitioner.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The bench, however, cited the findings recorded against him in the enquiry by the regional commissioner. “See how much land was allotted by you,” the bench said.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The counsel, then, pleaded to let the petitioner retire from the service. The bench, however, did not accept the request.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Ramakrishnappa, posted at Srinivasapur taluk in Kolar district during 2001-04, was served with the charges of passing several “reckless” orders, illegally granting various tracts of lands, including 134 acres of forest land.</p>.<p class="bodytext">He contended no disciplinary action can be initiated, alleging misconduct against a civil servant, in respect of any order passed by him in discharge of his duties as a quasi-judicial authority.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Rejecting his plea, the high court had said, indisputably, tahsildar is the head of revenue department in a taluk and custodian of revenue records and must be aware of records about nature of land.</p>
<p>The Supreme Court on Wednesday declined to come to the rescue of a Karnataka government officer, who was dismissed from service for illegally granting more than 134 acres of forest land to some 30 people as a tahsildar in Kolar district.</p>.<p class="bodytext">A bench of Justices Madan B Lokur and Deepak Gupta dismissed a petition filed by E Ramakrishnappa against the Karnataka High Court’s judgement of March 26, 2018, that had declined to interfere with the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal’s order.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The tribunal had rejected an application by the officer, then working as undersecretary, against his dismissal on August 27, 2013.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Advocate S N Bhat, representing Ramakrishnappa, contended no charge for personal gain was made against the petitioner.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The bench, however, cited the findings recorded against him in the enquiry by the regional commissioner. “See how much land was allotted by you,” the bench said.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The counsel, then, pleaded to let the petitioner retire from the service. The bench, however, did not accept the request.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Ramakrishnappa, posted at Srinivasapur taluk in Kolar district during 2001-04, was served with the charges of passing several “reckless” orders, illegally granting various tracts of lands, including 134 acres of forest land.</p>.<p class="bodytext">He contended no disciplinary action can be initiated, alleging misconduct against a civil servant, in respect of any order passed by him in discharge of his duties as a quasi-judicial authority.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Rejecting his plea, the high court had said, indisputably, tahsildar is the head of revenue department in a taluk and custodian of revenue records and must be aware of records about nature of land.</p>