"In 2020, the Forest Department filed an Interlocutory Application in the the Supreme Court seeking permission to denotify the land by HMT. This has raised several suspicions. The Interlocutory Application must be withdrawn immediately and investigations in this regard must be followed," Khandre noted.
"Under Section 30(1) of the Forest Regulation Act, 1900, there is no legal provision for donating any forest land. Before granting any forest land for non-forest purposes, it must first be denotified and a gazette notification must be issued. However, it is reported that Bengaluru's then deputy commissioner, Hanuman, transferred the land to HMT through a donation deed in 1963. No gazette notification was issued regarding this donation deed, and the land was not denotified for non-forest purposes," Khandre stated.
Khandre noted that the Supreme Court rulings on Sharavati victims’ rehabilitation and in the Godavarman case clarify that the land currently acquired by HMT and sold to various organisations, departments and private individuals is indeed forest land. Once a forest, always a forest. The environment is more important than citizen rights," he noted.
Regarding the 201 acres of land sold by HMT, the Section 64A (of the Karnataka Forest Act, 1964) proceedings have been completed, and HMT has so far not filed an appeal against the order. Therefore, Khandre opined that the land held by HMT and the land it had sold were still considered forest land.
Published 11 August 2024, 17:09 IST