<p class="title">The Delhi High Court has held that the issue of paternity cannot be determined in a habeas corpus writ petition, after a couple moved the plea seeking custody of a boy in a shelter home, claiming that he was their lost son.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The court dismissed the couple's plea, while granting them liberty to file appropriate legal proceedings to seek declaration as parents and custody of the minor.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The court was dealing with a habeas corpus petition filed by the couple, claiming that a boy in the custody of Bal Sahyog, a child care NGO, was their lost son. They claimed that the boy showed a stark resemblance to their lost son and that his age was about the same as it would have been of their lost son.</p>.<p class="bodytext">A habeas corpus petition is filed for producing before a court a person who is under arrest or in unlawful detention.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The couple had urged that the boy should be handed over to them after conducting a paternity test.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Their counsel had submitted that the possibility of two failed DNA tests could be attributed to erroneous sampling or contamination of sampling.</p>.<p class="bodytext">A bench of justices Manmohan and Sangita Dhingra Sehgal said, "In a petition asking for the writ of habeas corpus, this court is not entitled to examine the issue of paternity. The primary consideration of the court in a writ petition for custody of a minor is not the legal right of this or that party, but the welfare of the minor."</p>.<p class="bodytext">It said, "Since the welfare of the minor is not the issue in the present case and further the minor is not in unauthorised and/or illegal detention of respondent no.3 (Bal Sahyog), this court is of the view that the present writ petition is not maintainable."</p>.<p class="bodytext">It observed that it was the duty of the court to issue the writ of habeas corpus to safeguard the freedom of citizens against arbitrary and illegal detention. </p>
<p class="title">The Delhi High Court has held that the issue of paternity cannot be determined in a habeas corpus writ petition, after a couple moved the plea seeking custody of a boy in a shelter home, claiming that he was their lost son.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The court dismissed the couple's plea, while granting them liberty to file appropriate legal proceedings to seek declaration as parents and custody of the minor.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The court was dealing with a habeas corpus petition filed by the couple, claiming that a boy in the custody of Bal Sahyog, a child care NGO, was their lost son. They claimed that the boy showed a stark resemblance to their lost son and that his age was about the same as it would have been of their lost son.</p>.<p class="bodytext">A habeas corpus petition is filed for producing before a court a person who is under arrest or in unlawful detention.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The couple had urged that the boy should be handed over to them after conducting a paternity test.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Their counsel had submitted that the possibility of two failed DNA tests could be attributed to erroneous sampling or contamination of sampling.</p>.<p class="bodytext">A bench of justices Manmohan and Sangita Dhingra Sehgal said, "In a petition asking for the writ of habeas corpus, this court is not entitled to examine the issue of paternity. The primary consideration of the court in a writ petition for custody of a minor is not the legal right of this or that party, but the welfare of the minor."</p>.<p class="bodytext">It said, "Since the welfare of the minor is not the issue in the present case and further the minor is not in unauthorised and/or illegal detention of respondent no.3 (Bal Sahyog), this court is of the view that the present writ petition is not maintainable."</p>.<p class="bodytext">It observed that it was the duty of the court to issue the writ of habeas corpus to safeguard the freedom of citizens against arbitrary and illegal detention. </p>