<p>The following is the chronology of events in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute case in Ayodhya in which the Supreme Court Wednesday concluded a 40-day hearing and reserved the order. -</p>.<p><strong>- 1528:</strong> Babri Masjid built by Mir Baqi, commander of Mughal emperor Babur.</p>.<p><strong>- 1885:</strong> Mahant Raghubar Das files plea in Faizabad district court seeking permission to build a canopy outside the disputed structure. The court rejects the plea.</p>.<p><strong>- 1949:</strong> Idols of Ram Lalla placed under central dome outside the disputed structure.</p>.<p><strong>- 1950:</strong> Gopal Simla Visharad files suit in Faizabad district court for rights to worship the idols of Ram Lalla.</p>.<p>- Paramhans Ramachandra Das files suit for the continuation of worship and keeping the idols.</p>.<p><strong>- 1959:</strong> Nirmohi Akhara files suit seeking possession of the site.</p>.<p><strong>- 1981:</strong> UP Sunni Central Waqf Board files suit for possession of the site.</p>.<p><strong>- Feb 1, 1986: </strong>Local court orders the government to open the site for Hindu worshippers.</p>.<p><strong>- Aug 14, 1989: </strong>Allahabad HC orders maintenance of the status quo in respect of the disputed structure.</p>.<p><strong>- Dec 6, 1992:</strong> Babri Masjid demolished.</p>.<p><strong>- Apr 3, 1993:</strong> 'Acquisition of Certain Area at Ayodhya Act' passed for acquiring land by Centre in the disputed area.</p>.<p>- Various writ petitions, including one by Ismail Faruqui, filed in Allahabad HC challenging various aspects of the Act.</p>.<p>- Supreme Court exercising its jurisdiction under Article 139A, transferred the writ petitions, which were pending in the High Court.</p>.<p><strong>- Oct 24, 1994:</strong> Supreme Court says in historic Ismail Faruqui case mosque was not integral to Islam.</p>.<p><strong>- April, 2002:</strong> HC begins hearing on determining who owns the disputed site.</p>.<p><strong>- Mar 13, 2003:</strong> Supreme Court says, in the Aslam alias Bhure case, no religious activity of any nature be allowed at the acquired land.</p>.<p><strong>- Sep 30, 2010:</strong> HC, in a 2:1 majority, rules three-way division of disputed area between Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and Ram Lalla.</p>.<p><strong>- May 9, 2011: </strong>Supreme Court stays HC verdict on Ayodhya land dispute.</p>.<p><strong>- Mar 21, 2017: </strong>CJI JS Khehar suggests out-of-court settlement among rival parties.</p>.<p><strong>- Aug 7:</strong> Supreme Court constitutes a three-judge bench to hear pleas challenging 2010 verdict of the Allahabad HC.</p>.<p><strong>- Feb 8, 2018: </strong>Supreme Court starts hearing civil appeals.</p>.<p><strong>- Jul 20:</strong> Supreme Court reserves verdict.</p>.<p>-<strong> Sep 27: </strong>Supreme Court declines to refer the case to a five-judge Constitution bench. Case to be heard by a newly constituted three-judge bench on October 29.</p>.<p><strong>- Oct 29:</strong> Supreme Court fixes the case for the first week of January before an appropriate bench, which will decide the schedule of hearing.</p>.<p><strong>- Dec 24: </strong>Supreme Court decides to take up petitions on case for hearing on January 4, 2019.</p>.<p><strong>- Jan 4, 2019:</strong> Supreme Court says an appropriate bench constituted by it will pass an order on January 10 for fixing the date of hearing in the title case.</p>.<p><strong>- Jan 8:</strong> Supreme Court sets up a five-judge Constitution Bench to hear the case headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and comprising justices S A Bobde, N V Ramana, U U Lalit and D Y Chandrachud.</p>.<p><strong>- Jan 10: </strong>Justice U U Lalit recuses himself prompting Supreme Court to reschedule the hearing for January 29 before a new bench.</p>.<p><strong>- Jan 25:</strong> Supreme Court reconstitutes five-member Constitution Bench to hear the case. The new bench comprises Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justices S A Bobde, D Y Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and S A Nazeer.</p>.<p><strong>- Jan 29:</strong> Centre moves Supreme Court seeking permission to return the 67-acre acquired land around the disputed site to original owners.</p>.<p><strong>- Feb 26:</strong> Supreme Court favours mediation, fixes Mar 5 for order on whether to refer matter to court-appointed mediator.</p>.<p><strong>- Mar 8:</strong> Supreme Court refers the dispute for mediation by a panel headed by former apex court judge F M I Kalifulla.</p>.<p><strong>- Apr 9: </strong>Nirmohi Akhara opposes in Supreme Court Centre's plea to return acquired land around Ayodhya site to owners.</p>.<p><strong>- May 9:</strong> Three-member mediation committee submits interim report in Supreme Court.</p>.<p><strong>- May 10: </strong>Supreme Court extends time till Aug 15 to complete mediation process.</p>.<p><strong>- Jul 11:</strong> Supreme Court seeks report on "progress of mediation".</p>.<p><strong>- Jul 18: </strong>Supreme Court allows mediation process to continue, seeks outcome report by Aug 1.</p>.<p><strong>- Aug 1:</strong> Report of mediation submitted in sealed cover to Supreme Court.</p>.<p><strong>- Aug 2:</strong> Supreme Court decides to conduct day-to day hearing from Aug 6 as mediation fails.</p>.<p><strong>- Aug 6:</strong> Supreme Court commences day-to-day hearing on the land dispute.</p>.<p><strong>- Oct 4:</strong> Supreme Court says it will wrap up hearing on Oct 17, judgment by Nov 17.</p>.<p>- Supreme Court directs UP govt to provide security to state Waqf Board Chairperson.</p>.<p><strong>- Oct 16: </strong>Supreme Court concludes hearing; reserves order.</p>
<p>The following is the chronology of events in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute case in Ayodhya in which the Supreme Court Wednesday concluded a 40-day hearing and reserved the order. -</p>.<p><strong>- 1528:</strong> Babri Masjid built by Mir Baqi, commander of Mughal emperor Babur.</p>.<p><strong>- 1885:</strong> Mahant Raghubar Das files plea in Faizabad district court seeking permission to build a canopy outside the disputed structure. The court rejects the plea.</p>.<p><strong>- 1949:</strong> Idols of Ram Lalla placed under central dome outside the disputed structure.</p>.<p><strong>- 1950:</strong> Gopal Simla Visharad files suit in Faizabad district court for rights to worship the idols of Ram Lalla.</p>.<p>- Paramhans Ramachandra Das files suit for the continuation of worship and keeping the idols.</p>.<p><strong>- 1959:</strong> Nirmohi Akhara files suit seeking possession of the site.</p>.<p><strong>- 1981:</strong> UP Sunni Central Waqf Board files suit for possession of the site.</p>.<p><strong>- Feb 1, 1986: </strong>Local court orders the government to open the site for Hindu worshippers.</p>.<p><strong>- Aug 14, 1989: </strong>Allahabad HC orders maintenance of the status quo in respect of the disputed structure.</p>.<p><strong>- Dec 6, 1992:</strong> Babri Masjid demolished.</p>.<p><strong>- Apr 3, 1993:</strong> 'Acquisition of Certain Area at Ayodhya Act' passed for acquiring land by Centre in the disputed area.</p>.<p>- Various writ petitions, including one by Ismail Faruqui, filed in Allahabad HC challenging various aspects of the Act.</p>.<p>- Supreme Court exercising its jurisdiction under Article 139A, transferred the writ petitions, which were pending in the High Court.</p>.<p><strong>- Oct 24, 1994:</strong> Supreme Court says in historic Ismail Faruqui case mosque was not integral to Islam.</p>.<p><strong>- April, 2002:</strong> HC begins hearing on determining who owns the disputed site.</p>.<p><strong>- Mar 13, 2003:</strong> Supreme Court says, in the Aslam alias Bhure case, no religious activity of any nature be allowed at the acquired land.</p>.<p><strong>- Sep 30, 2010:</strong> HC, in a 2:1 majority, rules three-way division of disputed area between Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and Ram Lalla.</p>.<p><strong>- May 9, 2011: </strong>Supreme Court stays HC verdict on Ayodhya land dispute.</p>.<p><strong>- Mar 21, 2017: </strong>CJI JS Khehar suggests out-of-court settlement among rival parties.</p>.<p><strong>- Aug 7:</strong> Supreme Court constitutes a three-judge bench to hear pleas challenging 2010 verdict of the Allahabad HC.</p>.<p><strong>- Feb 8, 2018: </strong>Supreme Court starts hearing civil appeals.</p>.<p><strong>- Jul 20:</strong> Supreme Court reserves verdict.</p>.<p>-<strong> Sep 27: </strong>Supreme Court declines to refer the case to a five-judge Constitution bench. Case to be heard by a newly constituted three-judge bench on October 29.</p>.<p><strong>- Oct 29:</strong> Supreme Court fixes the case for the first week of January before an appropriate bench, which will decide the schedule of hearing.</p>.<p><strong>- Dec 24: </strong>Supreme Court decides to take up petitions on case for hearing on January 4, 2019.</p>.<p><strong>- Jan 4, 2019:</strong> Supreme Court says an appropriate bench constituted by it will pass an order on January 10 for fixing the date of hearing in the title case.</p>.<p><strong>- Jan 8:</strong> Supreme Court sets up a five-judge Constitution Bench to hear the case headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and comprising justices S A Bobde, N V Ramana, U U Lalit and D Y Chandrachud.</p>.<p><strong>- Jan 10: </strong>Justice U U Lalit recuses himself prompting Supreme Court to reschedule the hearing for January 29 before a new bench.</p>.<p><strong>- Jan 25:</strong> Supreme Court reconstitutes five-member Constitution Bench to hear the case. The new bench comprises Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justices S A Bobde, D Y Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and S A Nazeer.</p>.<p><strong>- Jan 29:</strong> Centre moves Supreme Court seeking permission to return the 67-acre acquired land around the disputed site to original owners.</p>.<p><strong>- Feb 26:</strong> Supreme Court favours mediation, fixes Mar 5 for order on whether to refer matter to court-appointed mediator.</p>.<p><strong>- Mar 8:</strong> Supreme Court refers the dispute for mediation by a panel headed by former apex court judge F M I Kalifulla.</p>.<p><strong>- Apr 9: </strong>Nirmohi Akhara opposes in Supreme Court Centre's plea to return acquired land around Ayodhya site to owners.</p>.<p><strong>- May 9:</strong> Three-member mediation committee submits interim report in Supreme Court.</p>.<p><strong>- May 10: </strong>Supreme Court extends time till Aug 15 to complete mediation process.</p>.<p><strong>- Jul 11:</strong> Supreme Court seeks report on "progress of mediation".</p>.<p><strong>- Jul 18: </strong>Supreme Court allows mediation process to continue, seeks outcome report by Aug 1.</p>.<p><strong>- Aug 1:</strong> Report of mediation submitted in sealed cover to Supreme Court.</p>.<p><strong>- Aug 2:</strong> Supreme Court decides to conduct day-to day hearing from Aug 6 as mediation fails.</p>.<p><strong>- Aug 6:</strong> Supreme Court commences day-to-day hearing on the land dispute.</p>.<p><strong>- Oct 4:</strong> Supreme Court says it will wrap up hearing on Oct 17, judgment by Nov 17.</p>.<p>- Supreme Court directs UP govt to provide security to state Waqf Board Chairperson.</p>.<p><strong>- Oct 16: </strong>Supreme Court concludes hearing; reserves order.</p>