<p class="title">In fresh trouble for the family of former finance minister P Chidambaram, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) has summoned his wife Nalini in connection with its money laundering probe into the Saradha ponzi scam.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Officials said Nalini has been summoned at the Kolkata office of the central probe agency on May 7.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The agency wants to record her statement under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) with regard to a specific link of her in this case, they said.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The Madras High Court had last week dismissed a petition by Nalini in which she had challenged these ED summons to her to appear as a witness in this case.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Justice S M Subramaniam had rejected Nalini's contention that women cannot be called for investigation out of their place of residence under CrPC Section 160 (police officer' s power to require the attendance of witnesses), saying such exemptions are not mandatory and are subject to facts and circumstances of a case.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Holding that such an exemption was not provided under the PMLA, the judge directed the Enforcement Directorate to issue fresh summons fixing a date for the investigation and proceed with it in accordance with law.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The ED had first issued the summons on September 7, 2016 asking Nalini, a senior lawyer, to appear at its Kolkata office as a witness in the Saradha chit fund scam.</p>.<p class="bodytext">She was allegedly paid a legal fee of Rs 1.26 crore by the Saradha group for her appearances in court and the Company Law Board over a television channel purchase deal.</p>.<p class="bodytext">She had earlier been questioned by the ED and CBI in this regard but agency sources had claimed that she was being summoned in the "light of new evidence".</p>.<p class="bodytext">During the hearings at the Madras HC, Nalini had contended that the summons was "purely politically motivated to damage her reputation."</p>.<p class="bodytext">Pointing out that receiving fee by a counsel for representing an accused was not an offence, she had said every lawyer who appears for a suspect in criminal cases charges professional fee.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The ED had filed a charge sheet in this case in a special PMLA court in Kolkata in 2016.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Nalini's son Karti is already being investigated by the ED in two separate money laundering cases of the Aircel-Maxis deal and the INX Media case and he has been questioned multiple times by the agency in context of these cases. </p>
<p class="title">In fresh trouble for the family of former finance minister P Chidambaram, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) has summoned his wife Nalini in connection with its money laundering probe into the Saradha ponzi scam.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Officials said Nalini has been summoned at the Kolkata office of the central probe agency on May 7.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The agency wants to record her statement under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) with regard to a specific link of her in this case, they said.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The Madras High Court had last week dismissed a petition by Nalini in which she had challenged these ED summons to her to appear as a witness in this case.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Justice S M Subramaniam had rejected Nalini's contention that women cannot be called for investigation out of their place of residence under CrPC Section 160 (police officer' s power to require the attendance of witnesses), saying such exemptions are not mandatory and are subject to facts and circumstances of a case.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Holding that such an exemption was not provided under the PMLA, the judge directed the Enforcement Directorate to issue fresh summons fixing a date for the investigation and proceed with it in accordance with law.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The ED had first issued the summons on September 7, 2016 asking Nalini, a senior lawyer, to appear at its Kolkata office as a witness in the Saradha chit fund scam.</p>.<p class="bodytext">She was allegedly paid a legal fee of Rs 1.26 crore by the Saradha group for her appearances in court and the Company Law Board over a television channel purchase deal.</p>.<p class="bodytext">She had earlier been questioned by the ED and CBI in this regard but agency sources had claimed that she was being summoned in the "light of new evidence".</p>.<p class="bodytext">During the hearings at the Madras HC, Nalini had contended that the summons was "purely politically motivated to damage her reputation."</p>.<p class="bodytext">Pointing out that receiving fee by a counsel for representing an accused was not an offence, she had said every lawyer who appears for a suspect in criminal cases charges professional fee.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The ED had filed a charge sheet in this case in a special PMLA court in Kolkata in 2016.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Nalini's son Karti is already being investigated by the ED in two separate money laundering cases of the Aircel-Maxis deal and the INX Media case and he has been questioned multiple times by the agency in context of these cases. </p>