<div align="justify">The nine-judge Supreme Court bench on Wednesday reserved its verdict on the question if the right to privacy should be treated as a fundamental right.<br /><br />The bench also stressed on the need to protect privacy in the era of technology though it could be a “losing battle”.<br /><br />The Constitution bench presided over by Chief Justice J S Khehar, heard marathon arguments for six days over a period of three weeks.<br /><br />Senior lawyers, including Attorney General K K Venugopal, Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, Arvind Datar, Kapil Sibal, Gopal Subaramaniam, Shayam Divan, Anand Grover, C A Sundaram and Rakesh Dwivedi, traded arguments in favour and against considering the right to privacy as fundamental.<br /><br />The judgement would be delivered on or before August 27 as Chief Justice Khehar would demit the office on that day.<br /><br />The bench said there was a need to “maintain the core of privacy” as the notion of privacy was fast becoming irrelevant in an all-pervading technological era.<br /><br />“We are fighting a losing battle of privacy. We do not know for what purpose the information will be used. This is exactly a cause for concern,” the bench, which also comprised justices J Chelameswar, S A Bobde, R K Agrawal, R F Nariman, A M Sapre, D Y Chandrachud, S K Kaul and S Abdul Nazeer, said.<br /><br /></div>
<div align="justify">The nine-judge Supreme Court bench on Wednesday reserved its verdict on the question if the right to privacy should be treated as a fundamental right.<br /><br />The bench also stressed on the need to protect privacy in the era of technology though it could be a “losing battle”.<br /><br />The Constitution bench presided over by Chief Justice J S Khehar, heard marathon arguments for six days over a period of three weeks.<br /><br />Senior lawyers, including Attorney General K K Venugopal, Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, Arvind Datar, Kapil Sibal, Gopal Subaramaniam, Shayam Divan, Anand Grover, C A Sundaram and Rakesh Dwivedi, traded arguments in favour and against considering the right to privacy as fundamental.<br /><br />The judgement would be delivered on or before August 27 as Chief Justice Khehar would demit the office on that day.<br /><br />The bench said there was a need to “maintain the core of privacy” as the notion of privacy was fast becoming irrelevant in an all-pervading technological era.<br /><br />“We are fighting a losing battle of privacy. We do not know for what purpose the information will be used. This is exactly a cause for concern,” the bench, which also comprised justices J Chelameswar, S A Bobde, R K Agrawal, R F Nariman, A M Sapre, D Y Chandrachud, S K Kaul and S Abdul Nazeer, said.<br /><br /></div>