<p class="title">The Bombay High Court on Wednesday fixed January 14 for a detailed hearing on petitions filed by three persons on death row for raping a photojournalist at Shakti Mills compound in 2013.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The decision was taken by a bench of Justices B P Dharmadhikari and Sarang Kotwal following the mutual consent of the state government and the trio's counsels.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Three of the five accused who were convicted by the sessions court in the city in 2014 -- Vijay Jadhav, Kasim Bengali and Salim Ansari -- had moved the high court after they were sentenced to death for being repeat offenders.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The court had also found them guilty for raping another woman on Shakti Mills' premises earlier.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The fourth accused, Siraj Khan, was sentenced to life imprisonment and the fifth, a minor, was sent to a correctional facility.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Jadhav, Bengali and Ansari had challenged the Constitutional validity of section 376 (E) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) during the trial.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The section was introduced by the Union government after the infamous 2012 Delhi gang-rape case.</p>.<p class="bodytext">In March 2013, the Union government amended the rape laws in the country and introduced several stringent provisions, including section 376 (E).</p>.<p class="bodytext">According to the section, if a person, who has been previously convicted for an offence of rape under various provisions of section 376 of the IPC, is subsequently convicted for a repeat offence of rape, the courts can sentence him to imprisonment for the rest of his life, or, even award a death sentence.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The photojournalist, who had gone to Shatki Mills on an assignment with a male colleague, was gang-raped on August 22, 2013, sending shock waves through the city.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The prosecution invoked Section 376 (E) after it was found that four of the accused had raped an 18-year-old telephone operator at the same place a few months ago. </p>
<p class="title">The Bombay High Court on Wednesday fixed January 14 for a detailed hearing on petitions filed by three persons on death row for raping a photojournalist at Shakti Mills compound in 2013.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The decision was taken by a bench of Justices B P Dharmadhikari and Sarang Kotwal following the mutual consent of the state government and the trio's counsels.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Three of the five accused who were convicted by the sessions court in the city in 2014 -- Vijay Jadhav, Kasim Bengali and Salim Ansari -- had moved the high court after they were sentenced to death for being repeat offenders.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The court had also found them guilty for raping another woman on Shakti Mills' premises earlier.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The fourth accused, Siraj Khan, was sentenced to life imprisonment and the fifth, a minor, was sent to a correctional facility.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Jadhav, Bengali and Ansari had challenged the Constitutional validity of section 376 (E) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) during the trial.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The section was introduced by the Union government after the infamous 2012 Delhi gang-rape case.</p>.<p class="bodytext">In March 2013, the Union government amended the rape laws in the country and introduced several stringent provisions, including section 376 (E).</p>.<p class="bodytext">According to the section, if a person, who has been previously convicted for an offence of rape under various provisions of section 376 of the IPC, is subsequently convicted for a repeat offence of rape, the courts can sentence him to imprisonment for the rest of his life, or, even award a death sentence.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The photojournalist, who had gone to Shatki Mills on an assignment with a male colleague, was gang-raped on August 22, 2013, sending shock waves through the city.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The prosecution invoked Section 376 (E) after it was found that four of the accused had raped an 18-year-old telephone operator at the same place a few months ago. </p>