<p dir="auto">Attorney General K K Venugopal has declined to grant his nod for initiation of contempt proceedings against actor Swara Bhaskar for her comments against the Supreme Court.</p>.<p dir="auto">Usha Shetty sought the AG's consent to a petition demanding to take contempt action against Swara.</p>.<p dir="auto">On February 1, 2020, Swara reportedly said, "We are living in a country where the Supreme Court states that demolition of Babri Masjid was unlawful and in the same judgement rewards the same people who brought down the mosque".</p>.<p dir="auto">In his reply to the letter, Venugopal said, "the comment is not an attack on the institution...does not constitute criminal contempt".</p>.<p dir="auto">With regard to her comment, "we are in a situation where our courts are not sure whether they believe in the Constitution or not", the AG said that it is a vague statement and not related to any particular court. "Something which is so general that no one would take any serious note of this statement".</p>.<p dir="auto">Under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, a consent from the Attorney General or Solicitor General is required to initiate criminal contempt proceedings against anyone.</p>.<p dir="auto">Petitioner Shetty has now approached the office of Solicitor General Tushar Mehta for the necessary consent.</p>
<p dir="auto">Attorney General K K Venugopal has declined to grant his nod for initiation of contempt proceedings against actor Swara Bhaskar for her comments against the Supreme Court.</p>.<p dir="auto">Usha Shetty sought the AG's consent to a petition demanding to take contempt action against Swara.</p>.<p dir="auto">On February 1, 2020, Swara reportedly said, "We are living in a country where the Supreme Court states that demolition of Babri Masjid was unlawful and in the same judgement rewards the same people who brought down the mosque".</p>.<p dir="auto">In his reply to the letter, Venugopal said, "the comment is not an attack on the institution...does not constitute criminal contempt".</p>.<p dir="auto">With regard to her comment, "we are in a situation where our courts are not sure whether they believe in the Constitution or not", the AG said that it is a vague statement and not related to any particular court. "Something which is so general that no one would take any serious note of this statement".</p>.<p dir="auto">Under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, a consent from the Attorney General or Solicitor General is required to initiate criminal contempt proceedings against anyone.</p>.<p dir="auto">Petitioner Shetty has now approached the office of Solicitor General Tushar Mehta for the necessary consent.</p>