<p>The Allahabad High Court on Wednesday decided to continue hearing the matter pertaining to the Gyanvapi mosque dispute on February 12.</p><p>The HC will hear the Muslim Committee's plea challenging the Varanasi High Court order in the Gyanvapi mosque case from 10 am that day.</p><p>The Varanasi court had allowed regular worship to be conducted by a 'pujari' nominated by the Kashi Vishwanath temple trust and the petitioner who claimed his grandfather offered puja before the idols in the cellar up to December 1993.</p>.<p>On Tuesday, the Allahabad High Court asked the Muslim side to <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/india/uttar-pradesh/has-to-be-on-record-that-you-were-in-possession-of-cellar-allahabad-hc-tells-muslim-side-in-gyanvapi-mosque-row-2881910">prove</a> their possession of the Mosque's southern cellar in 1993.</p>.Varanasi court fixes Feb 15 for hearing plea seeking ASI survey of Gyanvapi basements.<p>Arguing for the plaintiff, Hari Shankar Jain said that the Hindu side performed daily prayers in the mosque's cellar till 1993 and yearly after that.</p><p>"Gyanvapi Mosque committee never objected to the same. The continuity of Pooja is there" he said.</p>.<p>Counsel for the Muslim side, S F A Naqvi denied Jain's claims and stated that the cellar was being used as a store room.</p><p>"No religious rituals happened there, that doesn't give them any rights. It was used as a storeroom. Nothing more", he said.</p><p>He also claimed that the Hindu side had surrendered it right to worship in the cellar in 1993.</p>.<p>Naqvi further questioned the January 31 decision of the now-retired Varanasi court judge.</p><p>"It is not mentioned in the order that it is being passed on its own motion, the order is in the air. The order of the DJ is without jurisdiction", he said.</p>.Won't concede any mosques to the Hindu side: Owaisi on Gyanvapi row.<p>Naqvi also questioned the presence of the Advocate General in the quote saying, "why is he sitting here when the state is not a party?", to which the judge answered saying that he is an 'officer of the court. </p><p>Agrawal also accused him of going against the court but Naqvi outrightly denied doing so.</p><p>"I cannot say anything against the court", he said.</p>
<p>The Allahabad High Court on Wednesday decided to continue hearing the matter pertaining to the Gyanvapi mosque dispute on February 12.</p><p>The HC will hear the Muslim Committee's plea challenging the Varanasi High Court order in the Gyanvapi mosque case from 10 am that day.</p><p>The Varanasi court had allowed regular worship to be conducted by a 'pujari' nominated by the Kashi Vishwanath temple trust and the petitioner who claimed his grandfather offered puja before the idols in the cellar up to December 1993.</p>.<p>On Tuesday, the Allahabad High Court asked the Muslim side to <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/india/uttar-pradesh/has-to-be-on-record-that-you-were-in-possession-of-cellar-allahabad-hc-tells-muslim-side-in-gyanvapi-mosque-row-2881910">prove</a> their possession of the Mosque's southern cellar in 1993.</p>.Varanasi court fixes Feb 15 for hearing plea seeking ASI survey of Gyanvapi basements.<p>Arguing for the plaintiff, Hari Shankar Jain said that the Hindu side performed daily prayers in the mosque's cellar till 1993 and yearly after that.</p><p>"Gyanvapi Mosque committee never objected to the same. The continuity of Pooja is there" he said.</p>.<p>Counsel for the Muslim side, S F A Naqvi denied Jain's claims and stated that the cellar was being used as a store room.</p><p>"No religious rituals happened there, that doesn't give them any rights. It was used as a storeroom. Nothing more", he said.</p><p>He also claimed that the Hindu side had surrendered it right to worship in the cellar in 1993.</p>.<p>Naqvi further questioned the January 31 decision of the now-retired Varanasi court judge.</p><p>"It is not mentioned in the order that it is being passed on its own motion, the order is in the air. The order of the DJ is without jurisdiction", he said.</p>.Won't concede any mosques to the Hindu side: Owaisi on Gyanvapi row.<p>Naqvi also questioned the presence of the Advocate General in the quote saying, "why is he sitting here when the state is not a party?", to which the judge answered saying that he is an 'officer of the court. </p><p>Agrawal also accused him of going against the court but Naqvi outrightly denied doing so.</p><p>"I cannot say anything against the court", he said.</p>