<p>US intelligence officials briefed senior military and administration officials Wednesday that Yevgeny Prigozhin, the leader of the mercenary Wagner Group, was preparing to take military action against senior Russian defence officials, according to officials familiar with the matter.</p>.<p>US spy agencies had indications days earlier that Prigozhin was planning something and worked to refine that material into a finished assessment, officials said.</p>.<p>The information shows that the United States was aware of impending events in Russia, similar to how intelligence agencies had warned in late 2021 that Russian President Vladimir Putin was planning to invade Ukraine.</p>.<p>But unlike with the initial invasion, when US officials declassified the intelligence and then released it to try to deter Putin from invading, intelligence agencies kept silent about Prigozhin’s plans. US officials felt that if they said anything, Putin could accuse them of orchestrating a coup. And they clearly had little interest in helping Putin avoid a major, embarrassing fracturing of his support.</p>.<p><strong>Read | <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/business/russia-turmoil-to-fuel-market-volatility-1230983.html" target="_blank">Russia turmoil to fuel market volatility</a></strong></p>.<p>In this case, the information that the long-running feud between Prigozhin, who got his start as “Putin’s chef” in St. Petersburg, and Russian defence officials was about to devolve into conflict was considered both solid and alarming. Prigozhin is known for his brutality, and had he succeeded in ousting the officials, he would likely have been an unpredictable leader. And the possibility that a major nuclear-armed rival of the United States could descend into internal chaos carried with it a new set of risks.</p>.<p>While it is not clear exactly when the United States first learned of the plot, intelligence officials conducted briefings Wednesday with administration and defence officials. On Thursday, as additional confirmation of the plot came in, intelligence officials informed a narrow group of congressional leaders, according to officials familiar with the briefings who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly. By Friday night, Prigozhin had dramatically escalated his feud, launching a march on Moscow that the Russian government described as an attempted coup. On Saturday, he called his fighters off and agreed to flee to Belarus.</p>.<p>CNN earlier reported that the United States had briefed congressional leaders about their concerns that Prigozhin was preparing to challenge Russia’s military leadership.</p>.<p>For years, Prigozhin hated Sergei Shoigu, the minister of defence, and Gen. Valery Gerasimov, the chief of the General Staff of the Russian armed forces, and the feeling was mutual, US officials said. But it took the war in Ukraine, officials said earlier this year, for the animosity to spill into the open, frequently expressed by Prigozhin in ill-tempered posts on Telegram, a social media platform.</p>.<p>In recent months, intelligence officials have tracked the growing animosity between Prigozhin and leaders of Russia’s defence ministry and spent considerable time analyzing it.</p>.<p>The intelligence agencies’ conclusion was that it was a clear sign of the internal tensions caused by the war in Ukraine, a product of Russia’s struggle to supply its troops adequately.</p>.<p>It was an indication, one official said, of how the war was going badly for both Wagner and the regular military.</p>.<p>Intelligence reports released as part of the Discord leaks also showed that the United States had intercepted communications between senior Russian military leaders debating how to handle Prigozhin’s constant demands for more ammunition.</p>.<p>In interviews before the current crisis, US officials said it was not just Wagner forces that faced supply shortages, but the entire Russian military. Those problems have plagued the Russian military for months, but US officials said earlier this week that they had become more obvious as the Ukrainian counteroffensive began.</p>.<p>Putin also may have given Prigozhin the false belief he could move beyond public criticism to action against his military allies. During the fight for the Ukrainian city of Bakhmut, the US government assessed that Putin very likely ordered regular Russian units to reinforce Wagner forces.</p>.<p>After the capture of Bakhmut, the Russian defence ministry moved to cut down the power of Wagner. Russia forced all volunteers for its forces to sign contracts with the Ministry of Defense. The move cut Wagner off from recruits and meant that for the mercenaries to return to the battlefield in Ukraine, Prigozhin would have to subordinate his forces to the Defense Ministry, said Tatiana Stanovaya, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.</p>.<p>Placing Wagner forces under the control of Shoigu was “out of the question” for Prigozhin, Stanovaya said.</p>.<p>Many of Prigozhin’s tensions with the military had played out in public. He used interviews and Telegram posts to berate Shoigu and Gerasimov, calling them incompetent and charging that they were misleading Putin about the progress of the war with Ukraine.</p>.<p>US officials conceded that there was an element of theatre to Prigozhin’s public complaints but that it was nevertheless useful for Putin, who himself has privately criticized his military leadership for being too passive during the Ukraine war.</p>.<p>Still, US officials concluded that Prigozhin’s public statements were not controlled by Putin. His fight with the ministry of defence, officials said earlier this year, was real, not political theatre, fueled by the huge casualties Russia had suffered in Bakhmut.</p>.<p>Prigozhin’s critique went beyond an argument over needed supplies. He charged that the military leadership was corrupt and incompetent. For their part, some military leaders were jealous of his influence with Putin, US officials said earlier this year.</p>.<p>But it was only in recent days that intelligence officials got the initial warnings that Prigozhin might take action.</p>.<p>Officials said that intelligence agencies had not known what the results of Prigozhin’s actions might be, but they were immediately worried about how it might affect the control of Russia’s nuclear weapons. President Joe Biden, speaking in October, talked of the dangers that Putin would pose if he felt cornered and said the United States was looking for “off ramps” for Putin.</p>.<p>Since Prigozhin took action Friday, US officials have been locked down, saying little publicly about his intentions or what they knew about events on the ground. Officials have been wary, both because events were moving fast and because they did not want to give Putin any excuse to blame the West for Prigozhin’s actions. But several officials said they fully expected that Putin would eventually say the uprising was the result of a foreign plot.</p>.<p>Prigozhin is under indictment in the United States for his role in trying to influence the 2016 presidential election in favour of Donald Trump.</p>
<p>US intelligence officials briefed senior military and administration officials Wednesday that Yevgeny Prigozhin, the leader of the mercenary Wagner Group, was preparing to take military action against senior Russian defence officials, according to officials familiar with the matter.</p>.<p>US spy agencies had indications days earlier that Prigozhin was planning something and worked to refine that material into a finished assessment, officials said.</p>.<p>The information shows that the United States was aware of impending events in Russia, similar to how intelligence agencies had warned in late 2021 that Russian President Vladimir Putin was planning to invade Ukraine.</p>.<p>But unlike with the initial invasion, when US officials declassified the intelligence and then released it to try to deter Putin from invading, intelligence agencies kept silent about Prigozhin’s plans. US officials felt that if they said anything, Putin could accuse them of orchestrating a coup. And they clearly had little interest in helping Putin avoid a major, embarrassing fracturing of his support.</p>.<p><strong>Read | <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/business/russia-turmoil-to-fuel-market-volatility-1230983.html" target="_blank">Russia turmoil to fuel market volatility</a></strong></p>.<p>In this case, the information that the long-running feud between Prigozhin, who got his start as “Putin’s chef” in St. Petersburg, and Russian defence officials was about to devolve into conflict was considered both solid and alarming. Prigozhin is known for his brutality, and had he succeeded in ousting the officials, he would likely have been an unpredictable leader. And the possibility that a major nuclear-armed rival of the United States could descend into internal chaos carried with it a new set of risks.</p>.<p>While it is not clear exactly when the United States first learned of the plot, intelligence officials conducted briefings Wednesday with administration and defence officials. On Thursday, as additional confirmation of the plot came in, intelligence officials informed a narrow group of congressional leaders, according to officials familiar with the briefings who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly. By Friday night, Prigozhin had dramatically escalated his feud, launching a march on Moscow that the Russian government described as an attempted coup. On Saturday, he called his fighters off and agreed to flee to Belarus.</p>.<p>CNN earlier reported that the United States had briefed congressional leaders about their concerns that Prigozhin was preparing to challenge Russia’s military leadership.</p>.<p>For years, Prigozhin hated Sergei Shoigu, the minister of defence, and Gen. Valery Gerasimov, the chief of the General Staff of the Russian armed forces, and the feeling was mutual, US officials said. But it took the war in Ukraine, officials said earlier this year, for the animosity to spill into the open, frequently expressed by Prigozhin in ill-tempered posts on Telegram, a social media platform.</p>.<p>In recent months, intelligence officials have tracked the growing animosity between Prigozhin and leaders of Russia’s defence ministry and spent considerable time analyzing it.</p>.<p>The intelligence agencies’ conclusion was that it was a clear sign of the internal tensions caused by the war in Ukraine, a product of Russia’s struggle to supply its troops adequately.</p>.<p>It was an indication, one official said, of how the war was going badly for both Wagner and the regular military.</p>.<p>Intelligence reports released as part of the Discord leaks also showed that the United States had intercepted communications between senior Russian military leaders debating how to handle Prigozhin’s constant demands for more ammunition.</p>.<p>In interviews before the current crisis, US officials said it was not just Wagner forces that faced supply shortages, but the entire Russian military. Those problems have plagued the Russian military for months, but US officials said earlier this week that they had become more obvious as the Ukrainian counteroffensive began.</p>.<p>Putin also may have given Prigozhin the false belief he could move beyond public criticism to action against his military allies. During the fight for the Ukrainian city of Bakhmut, the US government assessed that Putin very likely ordered regular Russian units to reinforce Wagner forces.</p>.<p>After the capture of Bakhmut, the Russian defence ministry moved to cut down the power of Wagner. Russia forced all volunteers for its forces to sign contracts with the Ministry of Defense. The move cut Wagner off from recruits and meant that for the mercenaries to return to the battlefield in Ukraine, Prigozhin would have to subordinate his forces to the Defense Ministry, said Tatiana Stanovaya, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.</p>.<p>Placing Wagner forces under the control of Shoigu was “out of the question” for Prigozhin, Stanovaya said.</p>.<p>Many of Prigozhin’s tensions with the military had played out in public. He used interviews and Telegram posts to berate Shoigu and Gerasimov, calling them incompetent and charging that they were misleading Putin about the progress of the war with Ukraine.</p>.<p>US officials conceded that there was an element of theatre to Prigozhin’s public complaints but that it was nevertheless useful for Putin, who himself has privately criticized his military leadership for being too passive during the Ukraine war.</p>.<p>Still, US officials concluded that Prigozhin’s public statements were not controlled by Putin. His fight with the ministry of defence, officials said earlier this year, was real, not political theatre, fueled by the huge casualties Russia had suffered in Bakhmut.</p>.<p>Prigozhin’s critique went beyond an argument over needed supplies. He charged that the military leadership was corrupt and incompetent. For their part, some military leaders were jealous of his influence with Putin, US officials said earlier this year.</p>.<p>But it was only in recent days that intelligence officials got the initial warnings that Prigozhin might take action.</p>.<p>Officials said that intelligence agencies had not known what the results of Prigozhin’s actions might be, but they were immediately worried about how it might affect the control of Russia’s nuclear weapons. President Joe Biden, speaking in October, talked of the dangers that Putin would pose if he felt cornered and said the United States was looking for “off ramps” for Putin.</p>.<p>Since Prigozhin took action Friday, US officials have been locked down, saying little publicly about his intentions or what they knew about events on the ground. Officials have been wary, both because events were moving fast and because they did not want to give Putin any excuse to blame the West for Prigozhin’s actions. But several officials said they fully expected that Putin would eventually say the uprising was the result of a foreign plot.</p>.<p>Prigozhin is under indictment in the United States for his role in trying to influence the 2016 presidential election in favour of Donald Trump.</p>