<p>The Kerala government on Friday made a sensational claim before the Supreme Court that as many as 51 women between 10 and 50 years of age had so far entered Kerala's Sabarimala temple.</p>.<p>A bench presided over by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, which was taking up a plea by two women to provide them security, told senior advocate Vijay Hansaria that it was not necessary to make all these claims here.</p>.<p>The council said 51 women devotees so far had visited the temple. He said a committee of observers had been appointed by the Kerala High Court to monitor the situation for which the state had filed a challenge in this court.</p>.<p>Advocate Mathews J Nedumpara, appearing for a Lord Ayappa devotees association, countered the claim saying no woman devotee had visited the shrine.</p>.<p>The top court, however, directed the Kerala government to provide adequate security round-the-clock to two women, who claimed to face death threat after having entered the Sabarimala temple.</p>.<p>The bench, also comprising Justices L Nageswara Rao and Dinesh Maheshwari, closed the writ petition after issuing one-line order to the state government to provide security to the women.</p>.<p><strong>READ</strong><strong> MORE</strong></p>.<p><strong><a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/national/doubts-over-age-51-women-who-713690.html" target="_blank">Doubts over the age of 51 women who visited Sabarimala</a></strong></p>.<p><a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/national/give-security-women-women-713658.html" target="_blank"><strong>Give security to women who entered Sabarimala: SC </strong></a></p>.<p>The Kerala government submitted the women-petitioner had already been given police protection.</p>.<p>"You are responsible for their life and security. If you are already doing it, continue doing so," the bench said.</p>.<p>Senior advocate Indira Jaising, appearing for women petitioners Bindu A and Kanaka Durga, pleaded the court to consider their other pleas along with the pending review petitions.</p>.<p>The court, however, rejected this plea.</p>.<p>Besides the police protection, the women sought a direction to the authorities to ensure hindrance free entry to all females and ensuring their security. They also sought a direction to the authorities to ensure no rite of purification was performed or the temple was closed after any woman between 10 and 50 years of age entered the shrine.</p>.<p>The petition filed by them claimed that one of them was already attacked by her own mother-in-law. She is in a hospital. Both apprehended threat to their life.</p>.<p>The top court is currently seized up with a batch of review petitions for reconsideration of the Sabarimala judgement by a Constitution bench.</p>.<p>More than 40 petitions have been filed seeking a re-look on the judgement of September 28 which by a majority view of 4:1 allowed entry of women of all ages into Kerala's Sabarimala temple.</p>.<p>The court had earlier held that the ban imposed on the basis of the physiological condition of women amounted to gender discrimination.</p>.<p>The judgement which saw a huge protest in Kerala was sought to be reviewed on the ground that it was absolutely untenable and irrational.</p>.<p>It was contended that the deity is a 'Naishtika Brahmachari', females below the age of 10 and after the age of 50 years are eligible to worship him and there is no practice of excluding worship by females.</p>
<p>The Kerala government on Friday made a sensational claim before the Supreme Court that as many as 51 women between 10 and 50 years of age had so far entered Kerala's Sabarimala temple.</p>.<p>A bench presided over by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, which was taking up a plea by two women to provide them security, told senior advocate Vijay Hansaria that it was not necessary to make all these claims here.</p>.<p>The council said 51 women devotees so far had visited the temple. He said a committee of observers had been appointed by the Kerala High Court to monitor the situation for which the state had filed a challenge in this court.</p>.<p>Advocate Mathews J Nedumpara, appearing for a Lord Ayappa devotees association, countered the claim saying no woman devotee had visited the shrine.</p>.<p>The top court, however, directed the Kerala government to provide adequate security round-the-clock to two women, who claimed to face death threat after having entered the Sabarimala temple.</p>.<p>The bench, also comprising Justices L Nageswara Rao and Dinesh Maheshwari, closed the writ petition after issuing one-line order to the state government to provide security to the women.</p>.<p><strong>READ</strong><strong> MORE</strong></p>.<p><strong><a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/national/doubts-over-age-51-women-who-713690.html" target="_blank">Doubts over the age of 51 women who visited Sabarimala</a></strong></p>.<p><a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/national/give-security-women-women-713658.html" target="_blank"><strong>Give security to women who entered Sabarimala: SC </strong></a></p>.<p>The Kerala government submitted the women-petitioner had already been given police protection.</p>.<p>"You are responsible for their life and security. If you are already doing it, continue doing so," the bench said.</p>.<p>Senior advocate Indira Jaising, appearing for women petitioners Bindu A and Kanaka Durga, pleaded the court to consider their other pleas along with the pending review petitions.</p>.<p>The court, however, rejected this plea.</p>.<p>Besides the police protection, the women sought a direction to the authorities to ensure hindrance free entry to all females and ensuring their security. They also sought a direction to the authorities to ensure no rite of purification was performed or the temple was closed after any woman between 10 and 50 years of age entered the shrine.</p>.<p>The petition filed by them claimed that one of them was already attacked by her own mother-in-law. She is in a hospital. Both apprehended threat to their life.</p>.<p>The top court is currently seized up with a batch of review petitions for reconsideration of the Sabarimala judgement by a Constitution bench.</p>.<p>More than 40 petitions have been filed seeking a re-look on the judgement of September 28 which by a majority view of 4:1 allowed entry of women of all ages into Kerala's Sabarimala temple.</p>.<p>The court had earlier held that the ban imposed on the basis of the physiological condition of women amounted to gender discrimination.</p>.<p>The judgement which saw a huge protest in Kerala was sought to be reviewed on the ground that it was absolutely untenable and irrational.</p>.<p>It was contended that the deity is a 'Naishtika Brahmachari', females below the age of 10 and after the age of 50 years are eligible to worship him and there is no practice of excluding worship by females.</p>