<p>The Supreme Court on Monday said its primary focus is to provide relief to two women, who claimed to be victims of Talaq-E-Hasan, before deciding the constitutional validity of the form of divorce, which is pronounced once a month by a Muslim man, over a period of three months.</p>.<p>Dealing with their plea against the validity of Talaq-e-Hasan filed by two women, a bench of Justices S K Kaul and Abhay S Oka impleaded the husbands of the petitioners and sought their response.</p>.<p><strong>Also read: <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/national/supreme-court-says-practice-of-talaq-e-hasan-not-so-improper-as-women-also-have-an-option-1136546.html" target="_blank">Supreme Court says practice of Talaq-e-Hasan 'not so improper' as women also have an option</a></strong></p>.<p>“We thought that you wanted a remedy for yourselves. We will issue notice to the husbands alone at this stage and issue notice on this limited aspect. Our concern is sometimes in the endeavour to raise a larger issue, what relief the parties need gets lost,” the bench said.</p>.<p>“There are two people before us, who need relief and we are concerned with that. We will see later what are the issues remaining,” the bench said.</p>.<p>Benazeer Heena and Nazreen Nisha challenged the constitutional validity of the practice of Talaq-e-Hasan. They were represented by senior advocates Shyam Divan and Ranjit Kumar respectively.</p>.<p>The court put the matter for further hearing on October 11.</p>
<p>The Supreme Court on Monday said its primary focus is to provide relief to two women, who claimed to be victims of Talaq-E-Hasan, before deciding the constitutional validity of the form of divorce, which is pronounced once a month by a Muslim man, over a period of three months.</p>.<p>Dealing with their plea against the validity of Talaq-e-Hasan filed by two women, a bench of Justices S K Kaul and Abhay S Oka impleaded the husbands of the petitioners and sought their response.</p>.<p><strong>Also read: <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/national/supreme-court-says-practice-of-talaq-e-hasan-not-so-improper-as-women-also-have-an-option-1136546.html" target="_blank">Supreme Court says practice of Talaq-e-Hasan 'not so improper' as women also have an option</a></strong></p>.<p>“We thought that you wanted a remedy for yourselves. We will issue notice to the husbands alone at this stage and issue notice on this limited aspect. Our concern is sometimes in the endeavour to raise a larger issue, what relief the parties need gets lost,” the bench said.</p>.<p>“There are two people before us, who need relief and we are concerned with that. We will see later what are the issues remaining,” the bench said.</p>.<p>Benazeer Heena and Nazreen Nisha challenged the constitutional validity of the practice of Talaq-e-Hasan. They were represented by senior advocates Shyam Divan and Ranjit Kumar respectively.</p>.<p>The court put the matter for further hearing on October 11.</p>