<p>The process should start slowly with a free flow of goods, persons, services and ideas.<br /><br /></p>.<p>Conflict is a relation of incompatibility between parties and not an attribute of one party. Therefore the solution is a new relation. While conflict gives rise to the danger of violence, it also provides an opportunity to create new realities.<br /><br />Four conflicts among many others are shaping our present reality. First case: The United States vs Latin America-Caribbean. At the meeting of the Organisation of American States (OAS) in Cartagena, every one of the 32 member countries except the US wanted Cuba readmitted to the body and called for the decriminalisation of marijuana. US President Barack Obama vetoed both; the relation is a scandal, since overshadowed by a sex scandal involving members of Obama’s Secret Service.<br /><br />Solution: The US yields to democracy, accepts both initiatives with a review clause after five years, and welcomes the organisation of Latin American and Caribbean states. Washington would be embraced by Celac and the whole world. And the world could continue its fight against the far more lethal tobacco. Obstacles? A falling empire clinging to the past, its fear of looking weak, upcoming elections, and huge problems like a crisis economy and social disintegration.<br /><br />Hostile Arabs<br /><br />Second case: Israel vs Palestine. Since 1971 I have argued for a Middle East Community of Israel with its five Arab neighbours, with Palestine recognised and restoration of 1967 borders with certain exchanges: Israeli cantons on the West Bank and Palestinian cantons in northwest Israel. I have also advocated an Organisation for Security and Cooperation (OSCE) in West Asia modelled on the European Economic Community (EEC) as of Jan. 1, 1958. Problems: Some Israelis argue: ‘Surrounded by hostile Arabs we cannot let them in that close; they overpower us numerically and would push us into the sea.’ Some Arabs complain: ‘The Jews penetrate us economically and run our economies.’<br />Answers: Decisions by consensus. The process should start slowly with a free flow of goods, persons, services and ideas; settlement and investment would come later. Build confidence. Change a relation that was badly broken by the naqba into a peaceful, evolving relation.<br /><br />Third case: the risk of widespread American anti-Semitism that would use scapegoating to explain the decline of the US and Israel. Imagine the US losing even more: the support its allies, the magic of being exceptional-invincible-indispensable, and the toppling of the dollar as world reserve currency. To avoid this, constructive action is required, not simply issuing anti-Semitism certificates and making US congressmen scared of questioning Israel, which jeopardises American democracy itself. <br /><br />Unfortunately, in US mainstream media, constructive discussions are few. Hundreds of points can be made, like when Europe was emerging from the ruins of World War II. Instead of degrading and humiliating Germany, two brilliant Frenchmen invited it into the family. Let a thousand good ideas blossom! Obstacles? Clinging to the past, vested interests, the war industry, and a blaming culture rather than a solution culture. But vast majorities should be able to prevail.<br /><br />Fourth, related, case: debt bondage. China-Japan-European Union (EU) vs US; and Germany vs Greece-Italy-Portugal-Spain-Ireland (GIPSI); the World Bank vs the Third World, as described in gruesome detail in John Perkins' ‘Confessions of an Economic Hitman’.<br /><br />I have mentioned that fabrication by the Russian secret police, the Protocols of the Elders of Zion a conspiracy revealed long ago. But condemnation is not enough, one must know what one talks about. The Protocols read like a textbook on how to get others into debt bondage, starting by making workers believe they could be better paid and how these ‘entitlements’ can push a country into bondage. <br /><br />Solution: debt forgiveness, the contracting of fewer debts, and the mobilisation of all internal resources to lift those at the bottom such that they have some buying power, rejuvenating the country with agricultural cooperatives and trade among GIPSI countries. The threat to the EU today is not only a single currency with no treasury much better would have been the euro as a common currency but a debt bondage gradient in what should be a more egalitarian community. This is the material out of which aggression is made. <br /><br />Obstacles? Neoliberal market ideology and a failure to search for good ideas everywhere, for alternative economies.<br /><br />Conclusion: Humanity has vast positive and negative experiences. We should all join and build on them, wherever they can be found. <br /><br /></p>
<p>The process should start slowly with a free flow of goods, persons, services and ideas.<br /><br /></p>.<p>Conflict is a relation of incompatibility between parties and not an attribute of one party. Therefore the solution is a new relation. While conflict gives rise to the danger of violence, it also provides an opportunity to create new realities.<br /><br />Four conflicts among many others are shaping our present reality. First case: The United States vs Latin America-Caribbean. At the meeting of the Organisation of American States (OAS) in Cartagena, every one of the 32 member countries except the US wanted Cuba readmitted to the body and called for the decriminalisation of marijuana. US President Barack Obama vetoed both; the relation is a scandal, since overshadowed by a sex scandal involving members of Obama’s Secret Service.<br /><br />Solution: The US yields to democracy, accepts both initiatives with a review clause after five years, and welcomes the organisation of Latin American and Caribbean states. Washington would be embraced by Celac and the whole world. And the world could continue its fight against the far more lethal tobacco. Obstacles? A falling empire clinging to the past, its fear of looking weak, upcoming elections, and huge problems like a crisis economy and social disintegration.<br /><br />Hostile Arabs<br /><br />Second case: Israel vs Palestine. Since 1971 I have argued for a Middle East Community of Israel with its five Arab neighbours, with Palestine recognised and restoration of 1967 borders with certain exchanges: Israeli cantons on the West Bank and Palestinian cantons in northwest Israel. I have also advocated an Organisation for Security and Cooperation (OSCE) in West Asia modelled on the European Economic Community (EEC) as of Jan. 1, 1958. Problems: Some Israelis argue: ‘Surrounded by hostile Arabs we cannot let them in that close; they overpower us numerically and would push us into the sea.’ Some Arabs complain: ‘The Jews penetrate us economically and run our economies.’<br />Answers: Decisions by consensus. The process should start slowly with a free flow of goods, persons, services and ideas; settlement and investment would come later. Build confidence. Change a relation that was badly broken by the naqba into a peaceful, evolving relation.<br /><br />Third case: the risk of widespread American anti-Semitism that would use scapegoating to explain the decline of the US and Israel. Imagine the US losing even more: the support its allies, the magic of being exceptional-invincible-indispensable, and the toppling of the dollar as world reserve currency. To avoid this, constructive action is required, not simply issuing anti-Semitism certificates and making US congressmen scared of questioning Israel, which jeopardises American democracy itself. <br /><br />Unfortunately, in US mainstream media, constructive discussions are few. Hundreds of points can be made, like when Europe was emerging from the ruins of World War II. Instead of degrading and humiliating Germany, two brilliant Frenchmen invited it into the family. Let a thousand good ideas blossom! Obstacles? Clinging to the past, vested interests, the war industry, and a blaming culture rather than a solution culture. But vast majorities should be able to prevail.<br /><br />Fourth, related, case: debt bondage. China-Japan-European Union (EU) vs US; and Germany vs Greece-Italy-Portugal-Spain-Ireland (GIPSI); the World Bank vs the Third World, as described in gruesome detail in John Perkins' ‘Confessions of an Economic Hitman’.<br /><br />I have mentioned that fabrication by the Russian secret police, the Protocols of the Elders of Zion a conspiracy revealed long ago. But condemnation is not enough, one must know what one talks about. The Protocols read like a textbook on how to get others into debt bondage, starting by making workers believe they could be better paid and how these ‘entitlements’ can push a country into bondage. <br /><br />Solution: debt forgiveness, the contracting of fewer debts, and the mobilisation of all internal resources to lift those at the bottom such that they have some buying power, rejuvenating the country with agricultural cooperatives and trade among GIPSI countries. The threat to the EU today is not only a single currency with no treasury much better would have been the euro as a common currency but a debt bondage gradient in what should be a more egalitarian community. This is the material out of which aggression is made. <br /><br />Obstacles? Neoliberal market ideology and a failure to search for good ideas everywhere, for alternative economies.<br /><br />Conclusion: Humanity has vast positive and negative experiences. We should all join and build on them, wherever they can be found. <br /><br /></p>