<p>Testing self-collected saliva samples could offer an easy, quick and effective mass testing approach for detecting asymptomatic Covid-19 cases, according to a study.</p>.<p>The research, published in the journal <em>Clinical Infectious Diseases</em>, tested and compared the nasopharyngeal swabs and saliva samples of almost 2,000 people in Japan who did not have Covid-19 symptoms.</p>.<p>"Rapid detection of asymptomatic infected individuals will be critical for preventing Covid-19 outbreaks within communities and hospitals," said Takanori Teshima from Hokkaido University in Japan.</p>.<p>Two different virus amplification tests were performed on most of the samples: the widely available PCR test, and the less commonly used but faster and more portable RT-LAMP test.</p>.<p><strong><a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/national/coronavirus-news-live-updates-india-world-coronavirus-vaccine-astrazeneca-Covid-19-karnataka-bengaluru-maharashtra-mumbai-tamil-nadu-chennai-delhi-kerala-gujarat-west-bengal-kolkata-deaths-recoveries-health-ministry-894534.html#1" target="_blank">For latest updates on Coronavirus outbreak, click here</a></strong></p>.<p>The number of positive and negative results in all samples was very similar, with the nasopharyngeal swabs and saliva samples able to detect those with the infection in 77-93 per cent and 83-97 per cent of subjects, respectively.</p>.<p>Both the tests were also able to identify those without the infection in greater than 99.9 per cent of subjects, the researchers said.</p>.<p>The virus loads detected in nasopharyngeal swab and saliva were equivalent and highly correlated, they said.</p>.<p>"PCR sensitivity is much higher than previously thought 70 per cent that came from initial data of symptomatic patients," Teshima said.</p>.<p>While finding both nasopharyngeal and saliva samples have high sensitivity and specificity to the SARS-CoV-2, Teshima said "saliva testing has significant logistic advantages over the commonly used nasopharyngeal swab testing."</p>.<p>"Self-collection of saliva is painless for examinees, and more importantly, it eliminates the close contact with the examiners, reducing the risk of viral exposure," said Teshima.</p>.<p><strong><a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/international/coronavirus-updates-cases-deaths-country-wise-worldometers-info-data-covid-19-834531.html" target="_blank">Coronavirus Worldometer | 15 countries with the highest number of cases, deaths due to the Covid-19 pandemic</a></strong></p>.<p>"We also found that it is unlikely that the sensitivity of RT-LAMP is significantly less than that of the PCR test, suggesting that it might be a useful alternative for diagnosing Covid-19 infection, especially where diagnosis is required at the point of sample collection, like in sports venues or at airports," Teshima said.</p>.<p>Researchers point to a limitation of the study that they did not follow up with clinical outcomes.</p>.<p>They suggest that the results give good indication that mass screening using self-collected saliva and rapid RT-LAMP testing could provide easy, non-invasive, quick and relatively accurate results, with minimal risk of viral transmission to healthcare workers.</p>
<p>Testing self-collected saliva samples could offer an easy, quick and effective mass testing approach for detecting asymptomatic Covid-19 cases, according to a study.</p>.<p>The research, published in the journal <em>Clinical Infectious Diseases</em>, tested and compared the nasopharyngeal swabs and saliva samples of almost 2,000 people in Japan who did not have Covid-19 symptoms.</p>.<p>"Rapid detection of asymptomatic infected individuals will be critical for preventing Covid-19 outbreaks within communities and hospitals," said Takanori Teshima from Hokkaido University in Japan.</p>.<p>Two different virus amplification tests were performed on most of the samples: the widely available PCR test, and the less commonly used but faster and more portable RT-LAMP test.</p>.<p><strong><a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/national/coronavirus-news-live-updates-india-world-coronavirus-vaccine-astrazeneca-Covid-19-karnataka-bengaluru-maharashtra-mumbai-tamil-nadu-chennai-delhi-kerala-gujarat-west-bengal-kolkata-deaths-recoveries-health-ministry-894534.html#1" target="_blank">For latest updates on Coronavirus outbreak, click here</a></strong></p>.<p>The number of positive and negative results in all samples was very similar, with the nasopharyngeal swabs and saliva samples able to detect those with the infection in 77-93 per cent and 83-97 per cent of subjects, respectively.</p>.<p>Both the tests were also able to identify those without the infection in greater than 99.9 per cent of subjects, the researchers said.</p>.<p>The virus loads detected in nasopharyngeal swab and saliva were equivalent and highly correlated, they said.</p>.<p>"PCR sensitivity is much higher than previously thought 70 per cent that came from initial data of symptomatic patients," Teshima said.</p>.<p>While finding both nasopharyngeal and saliva samples have high sensitivity and specificity to the SARS-CoV-2, Teshima said "saliva testing has significant logistic advantages over the commonly used nasopharyngeal swab testing."</p>.<p>"Self-collection of saliva is painless for examinees, and more importantly, it eliminates the close contact with the examiners, reducing the risk of viral exposure," said Teshima.</p>.<p><strong><a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/international/coronavirus-updates-cases-deaths-country-wise-worldometers-info-data-covid-19-834531.html" target="_blank">Coronavirus Worldometer | 15 countries with the highest number of cases, deaths due to the Covid-19 pandemic</a></strong></p>.<p>"We also found that it is unlikely that the sensitivity of RT-LAMP is significantly less than that of the PCR test, suggesting that it might be a useful alternative for diagnosing Covid-19 infection, especially where diagnosis is required at the point of sample collection, like in sports venues or at airports," Teshima said.</p>.<p>Researchers point to a limitation of the study that they did not follow up with clinical outcomes.</p>.<p>They suggest that the results give good indication that mass screening using self-collected saliva and rapid RT-LAMP testing could provide easy, non-invasive, quick and relatively accurate results, with minimal risk of viral transmission to healthcare workers.</p>