<p>Altering the altitude of less than 2 per cent of flights may reduce aircraft-linked climate change by 59 per cent, according to a study.</p>.<p>Aircraft contrails -- the white streaks aircraft leave in the sky -- could be as bad for the climate as their carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, the researchers said.</p>.<p>The team led by scientists at Imperial College London in the UK found that flight altitude changes of just 2000 feet could lessen their effect.</p>.<p>This combined with using cleaner aircraft engines could reduce contrail-caused harm to the climate by up to 90 per cent, according to the study published in the journal Environmental Science & Technology.</p>.<p>"Changing the altitude of a small number of flights could significantly reduce the climate effects of aviation contrails," said Marc Stettler from Imperial College London.</p>.<p>“This new method could very quickly reduce the overall climate impact of the aviation industry," Stettler said.</p>.<p>When hot exhaust gases from aircraft meet the cold, low-pressure air of the atmosphere, they produce white streaks in the sky called 'condensation trails', or contrails.</p>.<p>The contrail fumes include black carbon particles, which provide surfaces on which moisture condenses to form ice particles.</p>.<p>Most contrails last only a few minutes, but some spread and mix with other contrails and cirrus clouds, forming 'contrail cirrus' that linger for up to eighteen hours, the researchers said.</p>.<p>Previous research suggests that contrails and the clouds they help form have as much of a warming impact on the climate as aviation's cumulative carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, because of an effect known as 'radiative forcing'.</p>.<p>This is where the balance is disrupted between radiation coming to the Earth from the Sun and heat emitted from the surface of our planet going out to space, forcing a change in the climate, according to the researchers.</p>.<p>The key difference between CO2 and contrails, however, is that while the gas will have an impact in the atmosphere for hundreds of years, the impact of contrails is short-lived, and could therefore quickly be reduced, they said.</p>.<p>The researchers have used computer simulations to predict how changing aircraft altitudes might reduce the number of contrails and how long they linger, which would reduce their warming impact.</p>.<p>This is because contrails only form and persist in thin layers of the atmosphere that have very high humidity, the researchers explained.</p>.<p>Because these layers are thin, small changes to flight altitudes would mean that aircraft could avoid these regions, leading to fewer contrails forming, they said.</p>.<p>Using data from Japan's airspace, the team found that just two per cent of flights were responsible for 80 per cent of radiation forcing within the airspace.</p>.<p>"A really small proportion of flights are responsible for the vast majority of contrail climate impact, meaning we can focus our attention on them,” Stettler said.</p>.<p>Taking into account the congestion in the airspace above Japan, the team simulated these planes to fly either 2000 feet higher or lower than their actual flight paths.</p>.<p>The researchers found that the contrail climate forcing could be cut by 59 per cent by altering the altitudes of 1.7 per cent of flights.</p>.<p>The diversion in flight paths caused less than a tenth of a per cent increase in fuel consumption.</p>.<p>However, the researchers said the reduced contrail formation more than offset the CO2 released by the extra fuel.</p>.<p>Stettler suggests that their method of targeting only the few flights that cause the most climate forcing is the best way to avoid hikes in CO2 emissions.</p>.<p>"We're conscious that any additional CO2 released into the atmosphere will have a climate impact stretching centuries into the future,” he said.</p>.<p>“So we have also calculated that if we only target flights that wouldn't emit extra CO2, we can still achieve a 20 per cent reduction in contrail forcing," Stettler added.</p>.<p>The researchers said aircraft engines themselves also play a part in how harmful contrails are.</p>.<p>Black carbon particles are produced by incomplete fuel combustion, so new, more efficient engine combustion technology could help to reduce them by around 70 per cent, they said.</p>.<p>This, combined with small altitude changes, could help reduce overall contrail harm by around 90 per cent, according to the researchers.</p>
<p>Altering the altitude of less than 2 per cent of flights may reduce aircraft-linked climate change by 59 per cent, according to a study.</p>.<p>Aircraft contrails -- the white streaks aircraft leave in the sky -- could be as bad for the climate as their carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, the researchers said.</p>.<p>The team led by scientists at Imperial College London in the UK found that flight altitude changes of just 2000 feet could lessen their effect.</p>.<p>This combined with using cleaner aircraft engines could reduce contrail-caused harm to the climate by up to 90 per cent, according to the study published in the journal Environmental Science & Technology.</p>.<p>"Changing the altitude of a small number of flights could significantly reduce the climate effects of aviation contrails," said Marc Stettler from Imperial College London.</p>.<p>“This new method could very quickly reduce the overall climate impact of the aviation industry," Stettler said.</p>.<p>When hot exhaust gases from aircraft meet the cold, low-pressure air of the atmosphere, they produce white streaks in the sky called 'condensation trails', or contrails.</p>.<p>The contrail fumes include black carbon particles, which provide surfaces on which moisture condenses to form ice particles.</p>.<p>Most contrails last only a few minutes, but some spread and mix with other contrails and cirrus clouds, forming 'contrail cirrus' that linger for up to eighteen hours, the researchers said.</p>.<p>Previous research suggests that contrails and the clouds they help form have as much of a warming impact on the climate as aviation's cumulative carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, because of an effect known as 'radiative forcing'.</p>.<p>This is where the balance is disrupted between radiation coming to the Earth from the Sun and heat emitted from the surface of our planet going out to space, forcing a change in the climate, according to the researchers.</p>.<p>The key difference between CO2 and contrails, however, is that while the gas will have an impact in the atmosphere for hundreds of years, the impact of contrails is short-lived, and could therefore quickly be reduced, they said.</p>.<p>The researchers have used computer simulations to predict how changing aircraft altitudes might reduce the number of contrails and how long they linger, which would reduce their warming impact.</p>.<p>This is because contrails only form and persist in thin layers of the atmosphere that have very high humidity, the researchers explained.</p>.<p>Because these layers are thin, small changes to flight altitudes would mean that aircraft could avoid these regions, leading to fewer contrails forming, they said.</p>.<p>Using data from Japan's airspace, the team found that just two per cent of flights were responsible for 80 per cent of radiation forcing within the airspace.</p>.<p>"A really small proportion of flights are responsible for the vast majority of contrail climate impact, meaning we can focus our attention on them,” Stettler said.</p>.<p>Taking into account the congestion in the airspace above Japan, the team simulated these planes to fly either 2000 feet higher or lower than their actual flight paths.</p>.<p>The researchers found that the contrail climate forcing could be cut by 59 per cent by altering the altitudes of 1.7 per cent of flights.</p>.<p>The diversion in flight paths caused less than a tenth of a per cent increase in fuel consumption.</p>.<p>However, the researchers said the reduced contrail formation more than offset the CO2 released by the extra fuel.</p>.<p>Stettler suggests that their method of targeting only the few flights that cause the most climate forcing is the best way to avoid hikes in CO2 emissions.</p>.<p>"We're conscious that any additional CO2 released into the atmosphere will have a climate impact stretching centuries into the future,” he said.</p>.<p>“So we have also calculated that if we only target flights that wouldn't emit extra CO2, we can still achieve a 20 per cent reduction in contrail forcing," Stettler added.</p>.<p>The researchers said aircraft engines themselves also play a part in how harmful contrails are.</p>.<p>Black carbon particles are produced by incomplete fuel combustion, so new, more efficient engine combustion technology could help to reduce them by around 70 per cent, they said.</p>.<p>This, combined with small altitude changes, could help reduce overall contrail harm by around 90 per cent, according to the researchers.</p>