<p>After Google said they had achieved what quantum computing researchers had sought for years, a team of Chinese researchers now claim to have replicated the performance of Google's Sycamore quantum computer using traditional hardware.</p>.<p>In 2019, Google researchers claimed they had passed a milestone known as <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/science-and-environment/quantum-leap-in-computing-as-google-claims-supremacy-770677.html" target="_blank">quantum supremacy</a> when their quantum computer Sycamore performed in 200 seconds an abstruse calculation they said would tie up a supercomputer for 10,000 years.</p>.<p>Now, scientists in China have done the computation in a few hours with ordinary processors. A supercomputer, they say, could beat Sycamore outright.</p>.<p><strong>Also Read | <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/science-and-environment/artificial-intelligence-is-not-sentient-at-least-not-yet-1133622.html" target="_blank">Artificial Intelligence is not sentient, at least not yet</a></strong></p>.<p>"I think they are right that if they had access to a big enough supercomputer, they could have simulated the task in a matter of seconds," said researcher Scott Aaronson, a computer scientist at the University of Texas, Austin.</p>.<p>The team used a system comprised of 512 GPUs to complete the same calculation developed by Google to demonstrate it had passed the quantum supremacy milestone back in 2019.</p>.<p>The advance takes a bit of the shine off Google's claim, said Greg Kuperberg, a mathematician at the University of California, Davis.</p>.<p>Still, the promise of quantum computing remains undimmed, the team said.</p>.<p><strong>Also Read | <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/science-and-environment/when-bee-dance-inspires-robot-design-1131460.html" target="_blank">When bee dance inspires robot design</a></strong></p>.<p>Sergio Boixo, principal scientist for Google Quantum AI, said in an email the Google team knew its edge might not hold for very long.</p>.<p>"In our 2019 paper, we said that classical algorithms would improve," he said. But, "we don't think this classical approach can keep up with quantum circuits in 2022 and beyond".</p>.<p>The "problem" Sycamore solved was designed to be hard for a conventional computer but as easy as possible for a quantum computer, which manipulates qubits that can be set to 0, 1 or any combination of 0 and 1 at the same time.</p>
<p>After Google said they had achieved what quantum computing researchers had sought for years, a team of Chinese researchers now claim to have replicated the performance of Google's Sycamore quantum computer using traditional hardware.</p>.<p>In 2019, Google researchers claimed they had passed a milestone known as <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/science-and-environment/quantum-leap-in-computing-as-google-claims-supremacy-770677.html" target="_blank">quantum supremacy</a> when their quantum computer Sycamore performed in 200 seconds an abstruse calculation they said would tie up a supercomputer for 10,000 years.</p>.<p>Now, scientists in China have done the computation in a few hours with ordinary processors. A supercomputer, they say, could beat Sycamore outright.</p>.<p><strong>Also Read | <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/science-and-environment/artificial-intelligence-is-not-sentient-at-least-not-yet-1133622.html" target="_blank">Artificial Intelligence is not sentient, at least not yet</a></strong></p>.<p>"I think they are right that if they had access to a big enough supercomputer, they could have simulated the task in a matter of seconds," said researcher Scott Aaronson, a computer scientist at the University of Texas, Austin.</p>.<p>The team used a system comprised of 512 GPUs to complete the same calculation developed by Google to demonstrate it had passed the quantum supremacy milestone back in 2019.</p>.<p>The advance takes a bit of the shine off Google's claim, said Greg Kuperberg, a mathematician at the University of California, Davis.</p>.<p>Still, the promise of quantum computing remains undimmed, the team said.</p>.<p><strong>Also Read | <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/science-and-environment/when-bee-dance-inspires-robot-design-1131460.html" target="_blank">When bee dance inspires robot design</a></strong></p>.<p>Sergio Boixo, principal scientist for Google Quantum AI, said in an email the Google team knew its edge might not hold for very long.</p>.<p>"In our 2019 paper, we said that classical algorithms would improve," he said. But, "we don't think this classical approach can keep up with quantum circuits in 2022 and beyond".</p>.<p>The "problem" Sycamore solved was designed to be hard for a conventional computer but as easy as possible for a quantum computer, which manipulates qubits that can be set to 0, 1 or any combination of 0 and 1 at the same time.</p>