<p>The Karnataka government on Monday submitted before the High Court that it will promote all II PU students, including repeaters.</p>.<p>Earlier, the Department of Pre-University Education (DPUE) had announced its decision to promote regular/fresher students of II PU while holding examinations only for repeaters.</p>.<p>The state government submitted that it will promote regular/fresher II PU students by considering 45 per cent of their SSLC marks, 45 per cent of the I PU marks and 10 per cent of the internal assessment marks of II PU.</p>.<p>The government also said that it will promote all the repeaters by giving grace marks to the marks obtained by such candidates in the earlier attempt in the respective subject. </p>.<p>However, private candidates who are appearing for the II PU were excluded from the policy of promotion without examination.</p>.<p>Recording this statement, a division bench headed by Justice B V Nagarathna disposed of the PIL filed by S V Singre Gowda. The petition claimed that repeaters/failed II PU candidates are being forced to write examinations, whereas fresh candidates have been promoted without any examination.</p>
<p>The Karnataka government on Monday submitted before the High Court that it will promote all II PU students, including repeaters.</p>.<p>Earlier, the Department of Pre-University Education (DPUE) had announced its decision to promote regular/fresher students of II PU while holding examinations only for repeaters.</p>.<p>The state government submitted that it will promote regular/fresher II PU students by considering 45 per cent of their SSLC marks, 45 per cent of the I PU marks and 10 per cent of the internal assessment marks of II PU.</p>.<p>The government also said that it will promote all the repeaters by giving grace marks to the marks obtained by such candidates in the earlier attempt in the respective subject. </p>.<p>However, private candidates who are appearing for the II PU were excluded from the policy of promotion without examination.</p>.<p>Recording this statement, a division bench headed by Justice B V Nagarathna disposed of the PIL filed by S V Singre Gowda. The petition claimed that repeaters/failed II PU candidates are being forced to write examinations, whereas fresh candidates have been promoted without any examination.</p>