<p>The bill, which the Senate passed 93-7 last week, would repeal Article 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, which states that any person who engages in "unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy." Those found guilty of sodomy would be subject to court-martial.<br /><br />Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin, a Democrat, said yesterday that the repeal was simply a legal change because it is no longer constitutional. A 2003 Supreme Court decision struck down a Texas ban on sodomy as an unconstitutional intrusion on privacy.<br /><br />The committee said the changes in law were recommended by the Joint Services Committee on Military Justice and the secretary of defense.<br /><br />Senate negotiators are working to reconcile their version of the bill with the version passed by the House of Representatives and produce final legislation that would set policy for the Pentagon. Levin indicated that there are some differences with House lawmakers over the provision.<br /><br />A congressional aide close to the negotiations said yesterday that it was unlikely the repeal would stand. The aide spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private talks.<br />Conservative groups angered by the end this year of the ban on gays serving openly in the military were outraged by the proposed repeal of the sodomy provision.<br /><br />"Now, in its rush to accommodate the left, Congress may have inadvertently opened the door to even more perversion," Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council said in a statement. "As part of the defense authorization bill, liberals are pushing to make sodomy a legal activity under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. In its haste to make gay sex an official part of military life, the left could be unintentionally repealing the ban on bestiality too."</p>
<p>The bill, which the Senate passed 93-7 last week, would repeal Article 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, which states that any person who engages in "unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy." Those found guilty of sodomy would be subject to court-martial.<br /><br />Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin, a Democrat, said yesterday that the repeal was simply a legal change because it is no longer constitutional. A 2003 Supreme Court decision struck down a Texas ban on sodomy as an unconstitutional intrusion on privacy.<br /><br />The committee said the changes in law were recommended by the Joint Services Committee on Military Justice and the secretary of defense.<br /><br />Senate negotiators are working to reconcile their version of the bill with the version passed by the House of Representatives and produce final legislation that would set policy for the Pentagon. Levin indicated that there are some differences with House lawmakers over the provision.<br /><br />A congressional aide close to the negotiations said yesterday that it was unlikely the repeal would stand. The aide spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss private talks.<br />Conservative groups angered by the end this year of the ban on gays serving openly in the military were outraged by the proposed repeal of the sodomy provision.<br /><br />"Now, in its rush to accommodate the left, Congress may have inadvertently opened the door to even more perversion," Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council said in a statement. "As part of the defense authorization bill, liberals are pushing to make sodomy a legal activity under the Uniform Code of Military Justice. In its haste to make gay sex an official part of military life, the left could be unintentionally repealing the ban on bestiality too."</p>